I strongly object to regulations restricting my ability to invest in leveraged and inverse funds without jumping through hoops. My investment risks are my own to take. Unless the government or its agency would like to guarantee me a fixed return on my investments that is acceptable to me, it is wrong to constrain my options.
I'm curious. Since it is my understanding that you intend to limit investing to those with ample funds to invest and what you deem to be a good understanding of the investment markets, to protect people from themselves, will you do the same for the online gambling industry? People have been known to lose fortunes there too, not to mention traditional casinos.
I oppose this restrictions on my right to invest in leveraged ETFs.
Sirs- increased standards for qualified investors is one thing, making the precess to invest as one onerous is another. The proposed rules are onerous and seek to discourage investments by smaller qualified investors. Thank you
I absoloutely approve of your regulations to safeguard the public. Keep up the good work.
To Whom It May Concern:
Please find my official comment to FINRA Regulatory Notice #22-08. I oppose the contemplated restrictions for the following reasons (among other things):
1. Financial instruments available to retail investors (like myself) have to go through a rigorous disclosure/registration process before becoming available generally for investment. It thus seems unnecessary to impose
Politicians need to get out of our pockets and leave our crypto alone.
We should be able to invest as much as we want. It's not just for the Rich people
Give me crypto or give me death!
