Displaying 7161 - 7170 of 34836 Results
I oppose the USA Big Brother Nanny attitude of government regulation regarding investing. Especially stocks and forex. In forex only 3 countries in the whole world restrict leverage to maximum of 50 to 1. All other countries are allowed 500 and even 1000 to 1. Are these citizens smarter or is it those governments allow a person the freedom to spend their money as each person sees fit????
I oppose any and government regulations that would adversely affect my abilty to freely invest my money. From the wording I read you would not be allowing the stupid and the poor invest which would limit their ability to not be poor and stupid any more!.
pass a test ? if you fail you are stupid
If you do not have a high net worth , you are poor.
this is borderline communist !
I am an active small investor in an inverse fund. I am not accredited. Why are you considering limiting my access to these products. Just because I don't have a large account should not mean that I am disadvantaged by you. I am trying to be polite about this but really want to tell you off. Just stop trying to control the small investor ( or the large investor). Do something else with
Now you listen here you [REDACTED] crooks! You keep your dirty filthy hands off this SECTOR of the woods!! You have no right!! These are our rights our Currencies and is beginning built by out hands for all to take part in! You want to have own or control any Crypto!!!!?? Then you get off your [REDACTED] and put in work like we do every day and you put in work!! If your to lazy!! Then purchase
I oppose restrictions to my right to invest. Please do not set more restrictions.
I need to have the ability to decide on my own investments. Especially as an accredited investor I shouldnt be restricted from investing in leveraged products.
I am an adult capable of making informed decisions. Just think of all the tax revenue that you will lose. It will be in the Billions not hundreds of millions. Thanks, Eric Schodde
We investors need the access to all investment options. Leave inverse investments alone and let us be warned and informed by the information that is available.
Dear FINRA,
I have no doubt these proposed rule changes are not being taken in order to "protect" the average investor. Instead these rule changes seek to add further restrictions on retail investors in order to protect financial institutions from incuring losses during this period of high volatility. Passing these rule changes would be an injustice to the average American. I
To whom it may concern,
Please do not restrict the usage of leveraged and/or inverse funds. They serve a great purpose in hedging one's assets or enhancing returns. I'm very clear on how these products work and there is no reason regulators should be restricting my ability to invest or my strategies.