To whom it may concern,
I oppose restrictions to my right to invest in any public investments of all types.
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and your family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public
Hello,
I am adamantly opposed to any restrictions being placed on my ability to invest in inverse or leveraged ETFs. These funds make it plainly obvious that there is significant risk involved, but I for one have decided that there is a place for them in my portfolio.
If you're really concerned about protecting investors, perhaps you should focus your attention on illiquid and NON-
I strongly oppose any restriction placed on my ability to buy leveraged ETFs. I am a "smart" Retail investor who has done his homework, understand the risks and volatility that come with these leveraged ETFs and I want to be able to continue buying them.
They have given me sizeable gains over the long term.
Trading using margin or options is much more riskier. Options have
Comments: inverse ETFs: investors with small accounts and limited knowledge or no access to options have no way to hedge their position without inverse ETFs. Putting small retail at that kind of disadvantage exposes them to more risk and potential losses. It forces them into trying to time getting out of the market, and/or taking gains in the short term bracket instead of holding and hedging and
How much do the $'s spent by Americans on sports betting or lotteries help produce a cleaner/greener energy America? Those $'s are better spent on ERX ($58/sh) & ERY ($5/sh). ERX is the Energy Bull 3x ETF & ERY the Energy Bear 3x ETF. Will over 90% of that energy coming from fossil fuels, money spent on ERY is like investing in green energy. The Ukraine War has led to
I should be able to choose what type of investments I want to invest in for me and my family. This should not be restricted by regulations or to whom regulators feel should be allowed to trade. If it's a public investment, it should be open to the public. I have used inverse and leveraged funds to hedge against the huge market crash on 2020. This kept me from losing a significant amount of
Hello, Thank you for the opportunity to voice my opinion regarding this issue. As a small investor, I value a lot the opportunities presented from reversed and leverage assets. Public investments should be available to all the public, not just the privileged ones. I shouldnt have to go through any special process like passing tests before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged like hedge fund institutions. I understand a financial risk with these funds and know the consequences of covering the losses. You should not be the judge of imposing conditional regulations on each individual investors. When
This is WRONG! -- PERIOD! There is NO LEGITIMATE purpose for this. Let's face it and not beat around the bush, you simply do this SOLELY because you don't want the people to become wealthy and thus more independent and powerful than the criminals in positions of power who want to rule over the people. We all know this, you aren't fooling anybody. We The People know the risks and
INFORMATIONAL
Business Conduct and Responsibility Rules
Effective Date: October 15, 2002
SUGGESTED ROUTING
KEY TOPICS
Legal & Compliance
Operations, Trading and Training
Registered Representatives
Senior Management
Security Futures
Executive Summary
On October 15, 2002, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved rule