I OPPOSE RESTRICTIONS TO MY RIGHT TO INVEST I should not have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, including cryptocurrency funds such as BITO. I am capable of understanding cryptocurrency funds such as BITO and their risks. I do not need these measures imposed on me. I " not regulators" should be able to choose the public
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the above propose rule. Individuals should be able to choose the investments that are right for them and not be limited by criteria established by regulators. Information is required to be readily available from the financial companies offering the investment that describe the risks associated with each type of investment in the form of a prospectus or
Respected gentlemen/ladies, I have few things to say to you about these proposed new regulations: 1. Please let me continue to decide what I do with my money and where I put it. 2. Please let me continue to decide what my portfolio would be composed of and please stay out of my portfolio 3. Please don't tell me that I'm not intelligent enough to invest in public securities like
Hello just a few concerns about sec proposed rule#57 I believe it should be my choice not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right forme and your family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I also believe I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public
I am writing to oppose the possible upcoming changes from regulators on how I can invest my own money. My money is MY MONEY, and no one should have the authority to control my investment options. When necessary, I seek my own council from my trusted financial wealth sources to make my investment decisions. If I choose to invest in leveraged and inverse funds, this is my decision, and I am aware
Hello, I disagree with the proposed regulation. I believe it is up to the investor to risk his/her assets in the way he or she sees fit. Whether it makes the investing world safer or not, perhaps a lesson taught through experience rather than regulation would be a better way of allowing investors to discover what they should or should not invest in. I view these investment avenues as ways to
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for you and your family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. As a self-taught investor, leveraged and inverse funds have become an important part of my investment strategy. They are the easiest way for ordinary Americans like myself to either take defensive investment strategies as a
To FINRA: The last thing we need in America is another NGO telling me I can or can't do what anyone outside the U.S. can do - purchase shares of companies or funds that meet my investment strategy. Yes, there is enhanced risk with leveraged and inverse strategies, but it is an important and lucrative (if I've done my study accurately) part of building my portfolio. If you want some sort
Leveraged and inverse ETFs provide me an opportunity to protect long-term investment of hard earned capital during natural shifts in market conditions, rather than try and time the market and sell long-term investments to later rebuy (a proven ineffective strategy). To buy protective options is considerably more risky, and cost-prohibitive. These ETFs allow everyday investors a clear manageable
Please allow investors to make their own decisions on funds and securities they choose to invest in. I have personally been making my own investment decisions for several decades now. Leveraged investments are important to my strategies as I am able to stay ahead of market conditions (like inflation) vs. barely breaking even with non-leveraged investment options. Having to prove my means and