These investment options are critical to managing portfolio risk for many individuals. They should be available to all, and not just the elite. Implementing a rule such as this would allow the rich to continue to grow wealth while not providing the same opportunities for less wealthy individuals. Everyone deserves the right to decide what instruments they want to invest in. It should be for
I wanted to voice my opposition to SEC Proposed Rule #S7-24-15. As a consumer and investorI feel it is might right to choose investments that I have researched and vetted while being free of regulatory restrictions. The SEC needs to understand that with the Internet people are more informed than in the history of investing in the United States and are able to make informed decisions without
Once again, I am here from the government and I am here to help you, is big government at its worst. The only people who will benefit from this proposed rule are the market makers and professional investors who already have an edge in the financial markets. Instead of wasting your time telling people you do not think they are as smart as you are, how about taking equal time to do something about
FINRA has no business or right to regulate or limit the products in which private investors place funds. I understand and accept the risks of my investments in all types of funds. They are my funds to invest, not yours. An investment prospectus is sufficient to inform investors of the objectives and risks of any investment. Attempting to regulate who can and cannot invest in any fund, based on an
This ruling goes against the rights of all types of investors. You will have millions of u.s. investors leave the markets for good, if the markets can only go up with no inverse to be a cobtrarian vehicle to the ebbs and flows of the market. Shame on finra lately and the top 5%. Let the class warfare begin. Shame on you guys over at govt. agencies. Specially the tsp plans of the military to shut
SUGGESTED ROUTING
Senior ManagementLegal & ComplianceOperationsSystemsTrading
Executive Summary
On July 14, 1993, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved a new Section 71 of the Uniform Practice Code (UPC) requiring members to close out short sales in Nasdaq® securities that meet a certain clearing short-position threshold. In addition, the SEC approved
GUIDANCECorporate Debt SecuritiesSUGGESTED ROUTINGKEY TOPICSCorporate FinanceLegal and ComplianceOperationsSenior ManagementTechnologyTrading and Market MakingTrainingDebt SecuritiesOperationsRule 6200 SeriesTransaction ReportingTRACEExecutive SummaryOn June 14, 2004, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC or Commission) approved amendments to Rule 6230(a) of the Trade Reporting and
(a) The panel will decide what evidence to admit. The panel is not required to follow state or federal rules of evidence.
(b) Production of documents in discovery does not create a presumption that the documents are admissible at the hearing. A party may state objections to the introduction of any document as evidence at the hearing to the same extent that any other objection may be raised in
(a) The panel will decide what evidence to admit. The panel is not required to follow state or federal rules of evidence.
(b) Production of documents in discovery does not create a presumption that the documents are admissible at the hearing. A party may state objections to the introduction of any document as evidence at the hearing to the same extent that any other objection may be raised in
(a) Unless the parties agree otherwise, the submission of a matter for mediation will not stay or otherwise delay the arbitration of a matter pending at FINRA. If all parties agree to stay an arbitration in order to mediate the matter, the arbitration will be stayed, notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in this Code or any other rule.
(b) If mediation is conducted through FINRA
