Regulators,
As a middle class American, it should continue to be my right and prerogative to invest in all public investment securities including complex investments. Onerous rules put on citizens through burdensome regulations and requirements is not consistent with a largely free people and society.
I do not require additional measures imposed on me to invest in leveraged or inverse securities
I am horrified and appalled that such a scam would even be suggested. There are trillions of dollars invested in leveraged and inverse etfs. In a bear market the inverse funds are the only things going up, as well you know. You cannot manipulate the market higher by effectively banning short selling, which is what this does. It will not work. As for me, if you institute these rules or anything
TO: All NASD Members
ATTENTION: Trading DepartmentsBranch Office Trading Locations
On April 1, 1982, the NASD announced the commencement of real-time transaction reporting under Schedule D of the Association's By-Laws for certain NASDAQ securities that have been designated National Market System (NMS) securities. Since inception, the Association has been monitoring transaction reporting in
Hello:
I am writing to voice my opposition to the proposed rules for investing in leveraged and inverse funds. Its a violation of my rights as an investor and imposes unreasonable burden on my ability to trade in a timely manner. I consider myself well informed and do not need additional regulations to guide my investment choices. Leveraged and inverse products are an important part of my
Hello:
I am writing to voice my opposition to the proposed rules for investing in leveraged and inverse funds. Its a violation of my rights as an investor and imposes unreasonable burden on my ability to trade in a timely manner. I consider myself well informed and do not need additional regulations to guide my investment choices. Leveraged and inverse products are an important part of my
I am totally against any attempt from federal government regulators or lawmakers imposing any kind of restrictions on my ability to purchase ETFs, or any public investment funds. It is an extreme overreach of federal government. I do not want federal government regulators deciding if I am fit or qualified to invest based on some outlandish set of rules put on me and other investors. It is
I am a long time investor of Inverse leveraged ETF's. The decay risks are well understood and they are an important part of my portfolio, especially in hedging risk. It is my right to choose how to invest my money in these funds and I do not need the FINRA making more ridiculous rules to protect me from myself or creating additional barriers to freely move into and out of these funds at
Each person is accountable to themselves. Investment choices shouldn't be limited. If I fail to do my due diligence on ANY investment I choose to fund and that investment goes against me, then shame on me. Don't handcuff us and don't treat us like children! You can't make up new rules and regs to help prevent against every flavor of stupid that exists in the
It seems clear that any regulations on investment instruments like these are strictly to deny the general public from access to investment tools, and further the division between the ruling and working class. If FINRA really cared about the people you would be investigating dark pools, selling order flows, and limiting the way that short sellers are allowed to manipulate the market. I dare say
I invest in leveraged funds, and I am completely against this proposal. Specifically, I combine the leveraged funds with the non-leveraged versions of the same targeted index to achieve my desired level of leverage. While my returns obviously lag the index in adverse market conditions, I vastly outperform the market in up periods. I never use the inverse funds, but I always incorporate the
