Displaying 511 - 520 of 1654 Results
I am THE only person that should be able to choose investments that are right for me and my family. I do not want or need YOUR decisions imposed on me. I use leveraged and inverse funds to help me protect my investments or enhance my returns depending on market conditions. Restricting me to do so while allowing so called "professionals" to use the same techniques is abhorrent
I am opposed to the limitations the FINRA is contemplating imposing on right to choose who I invest with and what I invest in.
I am also against FINRA, a Not-for-Profit organization regulating my right to invest with whom ever I want to and in what I invest in and to have me go through any special process and testing I might have to take before investing is unconscionable.
Most investors are not
Dear FINRA, I am a former mutual fund manager and current private investor who has utilized many types of ETFs over the years to achieve my investment strategies. I find the leveraged ETFs to be very valuable and straight-forward and do not see the need for restrictions or further regulation. In my mind, the proposed regulations would add undue burden on investors and be a waste of taxpayer money
Washington, D.C. - The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) announced today that it has fined MetLife Securities, Inc., and three of its affiliates a total of $1.2 million for failing to establish an adequate supervisory system for the review of brokers' email correspondence with the public.
Please stay out of people's private lives. I've held some of these funds for quite awhile. Have I learned a hard lesson on how these products work?--YES. But I've held in waiting for an eventual bear market that I know someday will come. Now that is almost upon us, you want to change regulations where people like me can't play the game no more? Just as I'm about to get
There are currently many attractive, high return products in private markets that are not made accessible to public market investors. Further limiting trading of complex securities makes these unfair advantages even greater. I believe it is important to recognize and accept the associated risks, but regulators should not prohibit investment in such securities.
I currently use leveraged
Please do not limit private investors access to 2x leveraged index funds and non-leveraged inverse funds. A leveraged fund based on a broad index (S&P500, Nasdaq, total market, etc) tends to be a less expensive and safer alternative to broker margin. They represent a valuable tool for ordinary investors to access leverage outside of potentially predatory broker margin interest rates
I find it offensive that a regulatory agency wants to curtail the private financial investment choices of adult citizens, under the guise of "protecting" us.
Free markets work best when they are truly FREE. I am perfectly capable of reading the prospectus and understanding the risks of my investment decisions. If a person does not understand those risks, then the prudent move
I am a proven investor and know the risks associated with all my trades/investments. I believe as a private investor I should be able to choose the public investments I deem best for me, not regulators. I shouldn't have to go through any tests or special processes or have access to "x" amount of money to invest the money I have worked for. This proposed regulation
Why would you take more away from hard working individual private investors. This is unacceptable. Why should there be any regulations differences for anyone? You are considering making the market playing field even more uneven than it already is! I strongly object to any proposed changes to investing in any public securities, especially leveraged and inverse funds!! This will greatly affect