the system right now is set up for me perfectly since I am a inverse trader. it is a trading system I use instead of shorting stocks which if I had to like most inverse traders would defiantly do along with day trading which in my opinion would cause havoc on quality stocks and the market and also would cause a lot of traders to go into options were a lot of traders would get hurt financially. I
Government should be set up so that no man has to fear another. Im not afraid of the financial instruments I buy. Im a military spouse and use my understanding of the SQQQ ticker to time my entry and exit from this instrument. Im concerned that I simply will be shut out from investing in a way that has really worked for us and supplemented my husbands shockingly low wage. Please dont allow
Once again, I am here from the government and I am here to help you, is big government at its worst. The only people who will benefit from this proposed rule are the market makers and professional investors who already have an edge in the financial markets. Instead of wasting your time telling people you do not think they are as smart as you are, how about taking equal time to do something about
Once again the Federal Government is going to try and decide what is good for the public, the same public that pays for everything. The only person that should decide how I invest MY money, is ME. If you are going to impose a "test" in order for me to show understanding of the financial instruments I choose to invest it, I guess you're also going to reimpose the "poll tax
It is my money and only I should have the right to choose which investments I pursue. I am fully aware of the investment risks. That's why prospectuses are available. Additionally, these type of inverse and leveraged funds are excellent tools to hedge portfolios which all funds may not be held at one firm.
Stay out of my financial affairs. Having over thirty years of investment
I use levered and inverse funds on a regular basis in my portfolios. They are easy to understand and are a critical tool in managing my portfolio risk. I am retired and not interested in taking on risk that could result in a large drawdown. These tools help me reduce risk, they do not elevate my risk. My alternative would be utilizing options, which are more levered and risky that levered and
ONNX Store, a Phishing-as-a-service platform (PhaaS), is targeting Microsoft 365 (M365) accounts at FINRA member firms with an advanced social engineering attack known as quishing: a business email compromise (BEC) attack that uses QR codes in embedded PDF documents to redirect victims to phishing URLs.
SUGGESTED ROUTING*
Internal Audit
Operations
Systems
Trading
*These are suggested departments only. Others may be appropriate for your firm.
As of July 13, 1990, the following 19 issues joined NASDAQ/NMS, bringing the total number of issues to 2,645:
Symbol
I should be able to choose the public
investments that are right for me and my family.
Public investments should be available to all of the public,
not just the privileged. As a former Certified Financial Planner for nearly 30 years I know about market and investment risks and understand the complexity of trading leveraged investments.
I shouldn't have to go through any
This is ridiculous.
In the finance world, first I found the Pattern Day Trader (PDT) rule is ridiculous. If this is risky: when you don't have money (< $25,000), you cannot do it; when you have more money (> $25,000), you can lose them more quickly. It means you have a higher trial and error cost.
Now, the new rule is even more ridiculous, similar to PDT. People
