I am neither a major nor wealthy investor. Reinvesting profits taken into more speculative ventures has enabled me to set-up modest 529's to assist in sending my grandchildren to college. I don't use any original funds or income for leveraged speculation.
Why do you feel the need to control my investment strategies?
I would truly resent my rights to trade using any vehicle I choose that is legal and can be traded by others, professional or retail. It is my responsibility to understand the risks of whatever I trade and do not need a big brother looking after me. If I loose $$ because I do not understand something, that is part of my tuition of education. I am a grown up and responsible for myself. Please, no
I am strongly opposed to limiting the ability of investors to buy leveraged index funds. I and my children have found long term investment in TQQQ and UPRO to have increased our retirement savings and college tuition savings considerably, thereby eliminating our need to go into debt.
Limiting these opportunities to only high net worth investors only furthers wealth inequality - helping the rich
(a) Each member must create and maintain a written business continuity plan identifying procedures relating to an emergency or significant business disruption. Such procedures must be reasonably designed to enable the member to meet its existing obligations to customers. In addition, such procedures must address the member's existing relationships with other broker-dealers and counter-
As is often the case in government policy, the motivations of this seem good. However, limiting investments until someone has a liquid net worth of 1M or other limit has proven suboptimal. These specialized products are risk management tools - perhaps used to hedge a portfolio without selling and realizing gains, or taking advantage of markets that would otherwise be unavailable without a large
Continuing Education Planning
Continuing Education
Planning
Continuing Education Planning
Continuing Education Planning