I totally oppose regulations (restrictions) to my right to invest. It is my ability and education and experienced that guides me in my investment decision. If I make or lose money it is on me. My fault or my credit. That is the American way. I do not want to see regulators controlling my investments. For what purpose? To protect me? In America risk is rewarded and punished. That is the
Comments:I have used leveraged ETFs for many years. I am very aware of the risks and benefits. They have mostly served me very well because I know when and how to use them. I dont need or want some government bureaucrat, who probably knows nothing about investing, to limit my investment options. The only thing this administration knows how to do is take my hard earned money and give it away.
In the unlikely case your Notice 22-08 becomes law in the future, it should not apply to traders who have bought and sold L&I funds before, regardless of how long. All the funds have clearly explained in black and white, what the risks are and who they are good for. I am 100% against disqualifying or restricting access any trader from buying them if they acknowledge having read the
I shouldn't have to pass some kind of test to invest in inverse funds. I am educated and capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds, their risks, and their ability to hedge my investments when used as a part of my overall portfolio strategy.
I originally used these leveraged funds in several of my watch list portfolios where they outperformed the portfolios without applying
I, and not regulators, should be able to choose the public
investments that are right for you and your family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
Investors should not have to go through any special process such as passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. Explain that you are capable of
Please do not limit the average person's ability to trade leveraged and inverse ETFs. Add an option requirement like options if you must, but please do not take away yet another tool less wealthy investors can use to maximize the value of their trades. Risk is an inherent part of the market and just because something is risky does not mean that it can't be understood by the
Please don't tell me what I can and can't invest in. Being a small investor is tough enough without those in charge putting more and more roadblocks and restrictions. The vast majority understand the risks of investing and don't need to be treated like children with "Cooling off periods" that smack of a 5-yr-old being given a timeout.
If restrictions
3x Leveraged etfs (normal or inverse) need to be allowed access by all types of investors. As long as they are liquid, they can assume their own risk and get in and out of the positions. These investments are much less risky than options becuase options are way more volatile and less liquid at times. Personally, I increased my net worth drastically with these investments and I was able to
To whom it may concern:
I oppose restrictions to my right to invest for the following reasons:
1) I should be able to choose any investments that are right for me.
2) Public investments should be available to all, not just the privileged.
3) I shouldn't have to go through any special process before I can invest in public securities as I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse
Hello, I have been investing in leveraged inverse funds for as long as they have been around. I fully understand the risks and use them only as very short term hedges. They have been a very important tool in enabling me to dampen volatility of my returns over the years, and as a result I have achieved a very respectable Sharpe ratio.
Please do not make me jump through hoops to use them.
Thanks