I should be able to chose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all the public, not just the privileged Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategies. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks and I do not need any passing tests before Investing in public securities like inverse
Regulators should not choose the public investments that are right for me and my family - and my portfolio. Public investments should be available to all of the public. You shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks
I should have the freedom and flexibility to choose the investments that are right for me and my family. Public investment should be available for any investor, not just the privileged few. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged
Hello, I don't want you to limit my investment options. I have been investing for 35 years and I know the risks I am taking. I am concerned you are making these changes to limit my ability to invest in things that could go up substantially. The government is printing money like crazy and the markets could get pretty wild. You need to let individual investors protect themselves.
Dear FINRA Regulators,
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and
Greetings, Every year my brokerage house, Charles Schwab, sends a yearly form I must sign and return in which I have to acknowledge the risks of geared investment products. Otherwise my ability to buy those products is suspended. Please leave it at that. Managing my portfolio is enough work without complicating it with needless and unwarranted oversight. I have been using geared products for
As an stock market investor for many years, I have invested in a broad range of products including leveraged and inverse funds. I am well aware of the additional risks when added to my stock portfolio. Having the continued right to choose these products maintains my freedom to invest in public securities. Today, I use ETFs as a hedge in these volatile markets. I hedge to enhance my returns
I have been investing in leveraged ETFs and leveraged mutual funds for more than 20 years. These securities have been a valuable component of my investment strategy, and I don't think the FINRA should be limiting their use in order to "protect" investors like myself who are knowledgeable about their risks and rewards. I do not want any regulators to limiting my
I am 74 years old and have the majority of my assets under mgt. with two different styled advisors. I have invested in Pro Shares Short S & P 500 ETF for two small accounts (which I oversee) in a very limited and disciplined approach to offset the economic problems caused by the current administration in Washington. I understand the risk, but given the current market conditions,
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family, including the leveraged and inverse funds. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of