Displaying 491 - 500 of 1654 Results
I strongly oppose the proposed restrictions on these securities products. Primarily, I am able to evaluate, analyze and decide for MYSELF when and if these securities are appropriate for me. I possess, as do, I would presume, the overwhelming majority of inventors, the skills, knowledge, experience and discretion needed to decide whether or not to use them. These are important hedging tools,
I oppose new rule making that would make leveraged and inverse ETFs difficult or impossible for normal investors to buy. I have used these sorts of ETFs in the past profitably for both hedging risks and investment purposes. I believe these products are both understandable and useful to the average investor.
Given the recent blow-up of so-called qualified investors and family offices like Bill
As a long time private investor, I have the right to decide on my investment strategies, not a regulator. Specifically, I recently invested in an inverse fund tailored for the current inflationary environment. I am well educated, and resent being forced to take a special test to be allowed to invest in ANY equity or debt instrument. A regulator controlled decision will damage my investment
MUST KEEP MARKETS FREE AND OPEN.OR ITS IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE BUSINESSES MOVE, THIS INABILITY TO OPERATE AND BUY AND SELL COMPLETELY TAXLESS WHAT IS PRIVATE PROPERTY NEEDS TO STOP. BY TRYING TO CONTROL THIS YOUR KILLING A VERY GOLDEN GOOSE WHICH EXPANDS EVERYONES CAPACITY TO HAVE A BIGGER PIECE OF A BIGGER PIE
EVERYONE WINS BY TAKING TAXATION OUT OF ALL CRYPTO EQUATIONS, WE PAY ANY INTEREST TROUGH A
FINRA has no business or right to regulate or limit the products in which private investors place funds. I understand and accept the risks of my investments in all types of funds. They are my funds to invest, not yours. An investment prospectus is sufficient to inform investors of the objectives and risks of any investment. Attempting to regulate who can and cannot invest in any fund, based on an
June 4th, 2019
9 a.m. - 1:30 p.m.
FINRA District Office
55 West Monroe Street
Chicago, IL 60603
(312) 899-4400
Topics
Vetting New Products and Supervising Complex Products
Outside Business Activities and Private Securities Transactions
Register - $195
Do not pass more regulations. I am perfectly capable of understanding risk products including leveraged funds. I do not need FINRA Nanny State regulations nor do you have any constitutional authority to regulate the private individuals investing in the markets. The constitution guarantees my personal LIBERTY, which means my personal property is off bounds to FINRA. Back off or there will be
Government regulators must not impose arbitrary restrictions on private investors.
Many capital investments carry risk. Leveraged and inverse funds are central to my investment strategies, and I do not need -- nor will I appreciate -- interference with my basic right to purchase, hold, and trade them.
There is no legally-coherent or ethically-defensible rationale for adding additional
To whom it may concern. As a private investor, I should have the ability to choose investments that are right for me, and my family.... not the regulator!
Going through special processes such as a test BEFORE I can invest in public security such as leveraged and inverse funds, is limiting my freedom as an American citizen.
Leveraged and inverse funds are important investment strategies for me
As a small private investor, I am well aware of risks associated with the various vehicles available on the markets, including inverse funds and leveraged funds. While not core, these are tools that sometimes make sense, and they should not be placed behind barriers that inhibit or even prohibit my access to them. I do not require and do not welcome regulations that block my ability to implement