I use leveraged and inverse funds as a protection hedge and to enhance returns. I am fully capable of understanding leverage and inverse funds as well as risks. I don't need a special test before investing in these funds safely. I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family, not regulators. Public investments should be available to all of the
I have a very diverse portfolio and am very aware of the risks of investing in any stock/security/EFT/etc. currently on the market. I research what I invest in and do not want to be restricted in what I can invest in. I would not object to continued education being offered regarding various investments, but it's part of any investor's due diligence to be aware of what they are
In addition to the Helpline, FINRA has consistently focused on addressing concerns relating to senior investors. Our efforts have included rulemaking to provide firms with tools to address financial exploitation of seniors, guidance in FINRA publications, reviews of senior investor protection programs in our examinations, enforcement actions and collaboration with other regulators, as well as
I strongly oppose restrictions on my right to invest! I am able to choose public investments that are right for me and my family! I see no reason for you to restrict my use of them as I understand their risks! I don't need nor do I want your ways imposed upon me regarding leveraged and inverse funds which are important to my investment strategies. They are desirable even as a limited part of
I'm outraged that the government regulators think they need to limit my access to leveraged and inverse funds. These are public investments and should be available to all investors. Allowing only wealthy investors to use them to invest and hedge portfolios is unfair and gives wealthy people more advantages over small investors. My broker already makes sure I know the risks so additional
Individual Investors have the ability to make sound decisions right for us for personally & family. Leveraged and Inverse funds just like the name states, is easily understood and expressive. NO MORE requirements should be placed. An investment strategy should have risk mitigation (Inverse fund) and opportunity to gain (Leverage) Law makers should fix Loop holes for Hedge funds, and
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. If you want retail investors to continue investing through the rough markets, we need access to public securities like leveraged and inverse funds, which allow us to make bets against the market without the risks that come
I oppose restrictions to my right to invest. I-not regulators- should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I have made 200% in one stock and over 100% in three stocks. My banking stock is rising. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse and their risks. I do
Hello, I vehemently object to the proposed rule. I should have the full right to choose public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I object to any requirement that requires going through any special process before investing in complex products. Leverage and inverse funds are important tools for my
Having traded futures, metals, South African gold mining stocks, and a long-time investor in coins and bullion. I know of the risks of buying leveraged and inverse funds. Please do not limit or complicate my ability to make these purchases as I wish. Right now i am short the stock market with DOG and short intrest rates with TBF; Also long with oil holding USO. My money - my decisions!!!