I want to make my choose of public investments and those investments should be available to all and not just the privileged. There shouldn't be any test before investing in public securities which include leveraged and inverse funds. I am full capable of understand all the risks when I invest in leverage and inverse funds and I do not need measure to be imposed on me.
I not regulators should be able to choose the public
investments that are right for me. Public investments should be available to all of the public.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am
capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds
and their risks
I shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before I can invest in public securities,
like leveraged and inverse funds. I have been an investor for 40 years and am fully capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks.
I don't need restrictions placed on my ability to invest freely.
I do not agree with the premise of this proposed regulation. I am capable of understanding risks associated with different investments. Leveraged funds when used appropriately have helped me personally hedge my portfolio and enhance my overall return. I believe this to be overstepping the regulation boundaries beyond protection of the average investor. I employee you to not follow through with
Gentlemen,
Leveraged and inverse funds are important instruments in minimizing risk and helping you protect or hedge your investments. They are an important instruments in enhancing returns when used as a limited part of your overall portfolio.
When it comes to investing our monies, please continue to allow us to make are own choices!
Thank You,
Gregory
To Whom It May Concern,
I am commenting to oppose the proposed restrictions.
As an average long-term investor, I normally use leveraged and inverse funds to protect my investments. I believe that I have gained knowledge of the benefits and risks of investing these funds. I believe that I should be able to determine if I should invest to these funds by myself, without having to passing certain
I oppose this regulation because the etf/fund is already obligated by federal law to disclose risks and fees to the public. If a potential investor wants to invest in these securities, especially in a self directed brokerage account, they are acknowledging the disclosures laid out by the fund. Detailed disclosure is already listed in the fund/etf prospectus. Adding additional hurdles limits
Limiting levered funds would be akin to limiting options, futures, swaps, or any other derivative products that investors use to hedge risk or seek profit. Leverage exists everywhere. One example is a mortgage. Another example is home insurance. There is nothing special about levered funds that is any different that other examples of the use of leverage in the economy.
This does not need more big government! I'm a small-time investor, and I want to make my own investment decisions. Of course, all investing carries a risk - stocks, bonds, crypto, buying houses, etc etc.
These funds create an equal playing field for the small-time investors, not Wall Street. So please do not pass this. Thank-you.
People, not regulators, should be able to choose the public investments that are right for them. Public investments should be available to all the public, not just the privileged. We shouldn't have to go through a special process or pass a test before investing in public securities like leveraged and inverse funds. People are capable of making their own decisions and understanding the risks.