SEC Approves New NASD Qualification Requirements for Supervisors of Research Analysts; Compliance Date: No Later Than August 2, 2005
SEC Approves Amendments to FINRA Rule 4570
Exemptive relief is granted based on: representations that at the time of the contribution the individual was not employed by the firm and was not an MFP; the firm already had a significant business relationship with the state of whom the contribution recipient is an issuer official (as defined); the firm has instituted information barriers on certain municipal business communications; the individual will be prohibited from the solicitation of certain new municipal business for a period of time.
FINRA hosted a Regulation Best Interest (Reg BI) conference on Dec.18, 2019 in Washington, D.C. for firms to discuss best practices and approaches. Approximately 500 compliance officers and other industry participants attended the one-day event focused on assisting firms as they gear up for the June 30, 2020 compliance date for the SEC’s Reg BI and Form CRS.Reg BI establishes a "best
To whom it may concern,
The proposed rule is totally against capitalist markets. The whole nature of free markets and security trading is for people to be to decide where to invest. If they lose their investment, it should be their sole responsibility, just like it is when they gain.
Executive Summary
Effective July 1, 1996, tier sizes for 728 Nasdaq National Market securities will be revised in accordance with NASD Rule 4710(g) (formerly Paragraph 2451a7 of the Rules of Practice) and Procedure for the Small Order Execution System.
For more information, please contact Nasdaq Market Operations at (203) 378-0284.
SEC Approves Amendments to the Codes of Arbitration Procedure Regarding Award Offsets
Proposed Rule Change Relating to Capacity Management Plan
Members of FINRA,
Leveraged and inverse ETFs are of great importance to me
and I strongly object to any new restrictions on the usage of these investment vehicles.
I presume that the potential new rules are motivated by the beliefs that 1) these funds are excessively risky and 2) without the new rules, investors will not understand the risks. I dispute both premises. The risks are already
Proposed Changes to the Personnel Assessment and Gross Income Assessment Fees
