SEC Approves New FINRA Rule 4524 Requiring the Filing of Supplemental FOCUS Information and a Supplementary Schedule to the Statement of Income (Loss) Page of the FOCUS Report
I consider this regulatory notice an undemocratic and unfair development that is an attack on the working class.
The inherent risk in investing in leveraged ETFs is super low relative to the alternatives of buying options or buying shares on margin, which this action would likely push investors toward.
If the regulatory notice were to pass, I will be writing to my government representative.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process- like passing a test- before you can invest in public securities,
like leveraged and inverse funds. I am fully capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. Ultimately I am the one responsible for the handling of my money, and these measures should not be imposed.
I oppose restrictions and barriers of entry to investments such as leveraged and inverse funds. I utilize leveraged funds in particular as a part of broader strategy both as a hedge and to enhance returns. Investors such as myself are capable of understanding and weighing the risks and potential rewards. Unnecessary restrictions do not help us and are a waste of time and effort for investors,
Hello,
All investing has risk involved for the better or for the worst.
I must have the ability to choose what investment vehicle is correct for my situation without regulation. I do not have a pension and leveraged or unleveraged funds/ETF/Stocks can help me to become self sustaining in my later years. Please leave it alone.
The prospectus for proshare leveraged products adequately describe the risks involved. They are no more risky than many other product readily available to the public. FINRA should focus on such scams as Bitcoin and other digital currencies (also known as magic beans) that have zero intrinsic value and are openly marketed to the public through television.
I'm willing to accept the risk of investing in leveraged ETF funds. You have no right to take that privilege away from me.
Just another case of the fat cats wanting all the money for themselves so let's screw the little guy.
Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
Hello: I am deeply unhappy that regulators are considering limiting access to alternative investments. It is incredibly important for investors to have access to a wide variety of investment options. It is up to investors to understand the risk and rewards of any investment vehicles. I don't appreciate "Big Brother" to tell us what we can and can't invest in.
I have a right to invest freely in what I deem to be an acceptable risk for myself and family. Inverse and leveraged funds help me prospect and hedge against unanticipated moves in the market. By forcing people to jump through hoops by passing certain tests etc. it just creates more headache and slows down the efficiency of markets.
I strongly oppose restrictions on my right to invest in public investments. I should be able to choose the public investments that meet my investing goals without going through any special process or seeking someone's permission. I understand the risks of leveraged and inverse funds. Leveraged funds are an important strategy in enhancing my returns.