Displaying 3621 - 3630 of 9026 Results
I oppose the restrictions to my right to invest! Im the one but not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I know what Im doing and Im the one who takes all the risks. So I dont think I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before
I not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. You do not know best for others!
Public investments should be available to ALL of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds.
I am capable
Restricting investor access to inverse and leveraged funds while leaving such funds available to institutional investors is both discriminatory and likely to contribute to wealth inequality in America. Requiring a certain net worth is a particularly insulting way to discriminate against individual investors. I understand that these funds can move in ways that unsophisticated investors do not
I - not regulators should be able to choose the public
investments that are right for you and your family.
Public investments should be available to all of the public,
not just the privileged.
I strongly reaffirm that you the
FINRA that my rights are being infringed upon. I have the right to share my views, And you the regulators are required to take my comments into
consideration in
Individuals not regulators should be able to choose the public
investments that are right for you and your family.
Public investments should be available to all of the public,
not just the privileged
You shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before you can invest in public securities,
like leveraged and inverse funds. Explain that you
As is often the case in government policy, the motivations of this seem good. However, limiting investments until someone has a liquid net worth of 1M or other limit has proven suboptimal. These specialized products are risk management tools - perhaps used to hedge a portfolio without selling and realizing gains, or taking advantage of markets that would otherwise be unavailable without a large
Summary
The purpose of this Election Notice is to (1) notify members of an upcoming election to fill two large firm seats and one mid-size firm seat on the National Adjudicatory Council (NAC); (2) announce the FINRA Nominating & Governance Committee (Nominating Committee) nominees for these vacancies; and (3) describe the procedures to be included as an additional candidate on the ballot
I resent that a government agency wants to take my right to choose what I wish to invest in. This is not (yet) a socialist country. Why do you think the people of this country are not smart enough to decide for themselves if an investment is right for them? Investing in a varied selection of assets is a way to PROTECT ourselves (portfolio) from certain types of market moves. Why should we be
Who does the government think they are to determine what public investments I as an individual Im allowed to make? All investments have been vetted by regulatory commissions and are valid, legal, investment instruments that have been made available for decades. The idea that you would impose conditions upon which a private individual can make an investment is essentially communism and entirely
I am shocked and surprised that in a free world, attempts are made to restrict our citizens from trading what investment they are allowed to buy.
It is my right to choose which public investment is right for me, and all public investments shall be offered to everyone not just the privileged ones.
Every citizen should have this right and nobody should restrict this right. It should not be that I