Displaying 3491 - 3500 of 9026 Results
I feel strongly that I should not have to prove to anyone that I am capable of choosing my own investments. Such a restriction would prevent me from using inverse ETFs to hedge during downtrends in the market (such as we are currently experiencing) and also prevent me from taking advantage of downtrends in the market. Cooling off periods may expose me to a complete inability to protect my money
I am a public investor, I opposed restrictions to my right to invest in leveraged and inverse funds because: - Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged, I am not a regulator, I am one of the public, so I should have the right being able to choose any public investments; - I understand leveraged and inverse funds and their risks, I should not have to go
I oppose restrictions on my right to invest in public investments. I not regulators, should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and
Dear SEC, Rule #S7-24-15: I personally should be able to choose the public investments which I deem appropriate for me and my family. NOT you! Just because some may be privileged doesn't mean only they should have access. I do not need to pass some special test or have money as the privileged do to have access to a public investment. Leverage and inverse funds play an important part of a
My wife and I not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for our family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. We shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. We are fully capable of understanding leveraged
The SEC needs to stop placing burdensome regulations on the average trader while kowtowing to the rich. Stop over regulating everything! I not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I have been investing since the third grade and have been a licensed broker and am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. Regardless of my background this is move is over reach and I shouldn
I (not regulators) should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds
On October 23, 2023, FINRA announced the Small Firm Advisory Committee (SFAC) election for the Midwest and South Regions. Small firms in these regions will receive ballots via email from [email protected] to vote in this election (hard copy ballots will also be mailed to these firms). Voting concludes on November 22, 2023, and the newly elected SFAC members will take office in January