I am against regulators limiting investors from trading leveraged and inverse funds. They provide me a useful way of hedging so I don't have to sell portions of my portfolio that have tax consequences. These funds also provide additional liquidity to markets allowing them to function. These types of funds are easy to understand so the public should not have to be accredited or pass any test
I oppose restrictions on my rights to invest as I wish in public investments in regulated markets. I should be able to choose (without restriction) which investments are right for me, not just the privileged financial class. I shouldn't have to go through some special process or pass a test before having access to any public securities including, but not limited to: inverse funds, leveraged
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I'm am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family, NOT regulators. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities.
I use leveraged and inverse funds to diversify my portfolio in ways that order public
I have been trading leveraged and inverse funds for some time now and should remain to be allowed to do so without further qualification. I am aware of the risk involved and, as a responsible investor, should not be subject to special tests or requirements to trade in these vehicles other than being aware of the risks involved. I do not think my access should be limited from any particular
I object to government regulators deciding what I can and cannot do with my investable funds. I receive a prospectus when I buy products that require them, and the burden is on me to make an informed decision. I do not want to have to take any special courses or pass any tests or explain my reasoning to someone outside my family. I have an investment advisor with whom I can discuss whether
I feel that your proposed regulations are insultingly presumptuous. I alone will prosper or suffer from my investments. I dont need interference in my choices. I have been handling investments for many years and have done quite well. I can handle complex instruments, and more importantly I know my limits. I include leveraged or inverse funds when and only when I am comfortable that they are
I strongly oppose regulators deciding whether or not I can invest in public securities. I am well educated and have been an investor for a great number of years. I am perfectly capable of understanding risk factors and how to use these funds as a limited part of my portfolio to hedge/protect my investments. I should be able to make my own decision about what strategy is right for me. I do not
I oppose restrictions on my investment opportunities. I am a normal "retail" investor and not affiliated with any finanical institution. I have been able to educate myself and understand the risks of "complex" products such as those being considered for these regulations. I should not have to pass any "test", at most only sign/check an
I oppose restrictions on my right to invest in public investments. I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before to invest in public securities, like leveraged funds. I am capable of
