You shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before you can invest in public
securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. Explain
that you are capable of understanding leveraged and
inverse funds and their risks. Tell regulators you do
not need these measures imposed on you.
Taking this freedom away is wrong, Public
investments should be
I have seen countless people, both in my personal life and on the internet, lose money investing in complex financial products they never understood. Many times no explanation at all was available, and there was almost never a test to see if they could understand and retain an explanation if one was provided. I am only in my mid-twenties-- these people are meaningfully worse off for the rest of
I have the unalienable right to make the risk-reward analysis on investments for my account. I believe I am better qualified to choose investments that are best for me and my family. High net worth is the only measure of a citizens' ability to access the risks-reward balance of leveraged and inverse funds. One's education, business and life experiences are significantly more
I, not regulators, should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse
I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds. I do my own research and should not be required to take tests or have a high net worth to be able to invest. I use leveraged and inverse funds as insurance for my investments. Making these important investments harder to obtain would be very detrimental to overall portfolio security. I should be able to choose investments that I see fit
I oppose restriction to invest in public investments of leveraged and inverse funds.
We shouldn't have to go through special processes
like passing a test before we can invest in public securities,
like leveraged and inverse funds.
we are
capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds
and their risks. I do not
need more measures imposed. We already sign a statement
I should be able to choose the public
investments that are right for me and my family.
Public investments should be available to all of the public,
not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before I can invest in public securities,
like leveraged and inverse funds. I am
capable of understanding leveraged and
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for myself. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities,
like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. I
Comments:
Dear FINRA, please do not begin gatekeeping access to complex financial instruments based on an assessment or net worth basis. This jeopardizes personal freedom and creates artificial and unnecessary barriers in the market for individual investors to participate. This compromises liquidity, price finding, and is an infringement of liberty.
A focus on risk disclosure and awareness is
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, including cryptocurrency funds. I am capable of understanding cryptocurrency funds and risks. Regulators do not need these measures imposed on nor do we need capital gains tax so high on people who invest in crypto compared to those who invest in stocks
