We Americans not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for us and our family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. We shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before wevcan invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. Any average person of average intelligence is
Attn. FINRA: I oppose any limitations on my ability to buy these types of Funds as leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategies. I should be able to choose the public investments that I consider to be correct for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged few. As a seasoned investor I understand the risks!!! I
I object to Rule #S7-24-15 which would restrict my ability to make investment decisions for myself. It is totally unreasonable to suggest I take a regulatory test, when I just recently read Proshare materials, purchased some inverse products and have been watching those investments daily, as they suggested. For what reason should my freedoms now be restricted? How much more regulation does the
I should be able to choose the public investment that are right for me and my family, not regulators. Public investment should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. You shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my
I am a retired college teacher and have been managing my own investments for over 30 years. I am quite capable of learning about and choosing the investments that are best for me. All investments should be available to all people, not just the privileged few. I was able to retire because I had access to all kinds of assets to carry out specific strategies in varying market conditions over the
You shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. Please don't make the investment landscape more difficult by imposing unnecessary restrictions. Inverse funds are one of the few ways to have a strategy that
I feel I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for my family and I. All public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged or 1%. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I'm capable of understanding leveraged and inverse
I should be the one, not regulators, to choose public investments that at correct for my portfolio. No special process should not be required, and certainly not test performed to determine my ability to invest in public securities. Leveraged and inverse funds are very important to my investment strategies in hedging, enhanced returns, and as a limited part of my portfolio. I dont need someone
You not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for you and your family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. You shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. Explain that you are capable of understanding
I Oppose restrictions to my right to invest. And I should have the right to invest in leveraged and inverse funds just like the big wall street firms, hedge funds, etc. I am fully capable of understanding the risks and do not need to be tested or have additional barriers placed in front of me to proof to a regulator that I know what is best for my portfolio. This is too much oversight and I don
