I have the unalienable right to make the risk-reward analysis on investments for my account. I believe I am better qualified to choose investments that are best for me and my family. High net worth is the only measure of a citizens' ability to access the risks-reward balance of leveraged and inverse funds. One's education, business and life experiences are significantly more
You shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before you can invest in public
securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. Explain
that you are capable of understanding leveraged and
inverse funds and their risks. Tell regulators you do
not need these measures imposed on you.
Taking this freedom away is wrong, Public
investments should be
(a) The term "Clearing Broker-Dealer" or "Clearing Broker" shall mean the member firm that has been identified in the System as principal for clearing and settling a trade, whether for its own account or for a correspondent firm.
(b) The term "Correspondent Executing Broker-Dealer" or "Correspondent Executing Broker" shall mean the member
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I am able to invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I have been capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. Perhaps you want to impose these on new investors, however, I do not need these measures imposed on me and it would take away a ton of tax revenue if this
I not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family.
Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before i can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse
I am writing to express my opposition to the proposal to increase regulation on certain investments, applying a government-imposed "test" on my ability to comprehend my own investments or my ability to make them.
There are already ample warnings associated with these investments. I have demonstrated my ability to earn my money. I believe I should also have the right to decide
Do not block retail traders from making money under the auspices of "this is because you are too stupid and poor to be allowed to invest on your own." This proposal is insulting and transparent.
"Special tests" to invest is classist and racist. You are trying to block minorities and anyone who can't afford the time and money you determine is &
I not regulators should be able to choose the public
investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their
