Regulators,
Regarding FINRA Proposed Rule #22-08, I - not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family.
Public investments should be available to ALL of the public, not just the privileged or those you deem qualified. Less regulation, happier investors.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I
If the market is in fact a free market then this rule proposal would never have been proposed. A free market isn't just for the rich who can afford it. The choice to participate in the market is an individual choice that each person must make for themselves, that should not include taking a test before investing in public securities. Furthermore this will create further speculation that
FINRA should not restrict my ability to utilize leveraged and inverse funds as a means to grow wealth for my family and our future. I don't need you to further encroach on what has been a successful approach to wealth creation by adding extra and over-reaching restrictions and requirements like tests, net worth measures, cooling off periods and broker approvals. You are over-reaching
Ive worked in an administrative position for many years and am well versed in the market. I currently invest in some leveraged etf funds. Like all stocks and bonds, there is always a risk. It is up to the individual to do their homework. It would be highly unfair to subject regular investors to having to take a test or to jump through hoops to buy some of these products. Obviously global
I, not regulators should be able to choose the public
investments that are right for me and my family.
Public investments should be available to all of the public,
not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before I can invest in public securities,
like leveraged and inverse funds. I am fully capable of
I, not regulators, should be able independently to choose public investments which are best for me and my family. I should not be required to go through a special process such as passing a test to invest in securities such as leveraged and inverse funds. I as a private investor have sufficient understanding of the workings risks of such funds, and have enjoyed over 20 years of investing in such
I not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategies to cope up with market direction and events with measured risk that i take and control and not left to luck or hope in investing. I shouldn
This screams corruption.
You shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before you can invest in public securities,like leveraged and inverse funds. I am
capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds
and their risks. I do not
need these measures imposed on me.Leveraged and inverse funds are important to your
investment strategies. Me
The adoption of limiting my ability to trade leveraged ETF's such as provided by Proshares will drive me to find a brokerage that does not belong to FIRNA. Alternatively it will result in my removal of all funds from FIRNA regulated brokerages. I can't say with enough weight this effort to limit my investing options to increase the brokerage profit has severely degraded my
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just privileged.
I should not have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks.
