I should have the same opportunity to invest in leveraged and inverse funds as wealthy investors and institutions. Adding additional 'tests' to determine my ability to invest appropriately is an unnecessary burden on me. I utilize some leveraged and inverse funds as a hedge during difficult markets like the one now. These proposed restrictions will only hurt my ability to manage my
I should be able to choose the public
investments that are right for me and my family.
Public investments should be available to all of the public,
not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds.
I am fully capable of understanding leveraged and
Please do not take away my ability to invest in leveraged ETF and into anything. I'm well aware of what I'm doing and I don't need to be restricted by regulators. There are way too many restrictions on US investors already.
Tying ability to invest to net worth is elitist and exclusionary. It further perpetuates the wealth gap because one could only become wealthy
REGULATORS:
I not regulators should be able to choose the public
investments that are right for me and my family.
Public investments should be available to all of the public,
not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am
capable of
We don't need big brother controlling our financial decisions. This is not 1984! I've already graduated from school many years ago. I don't need to take anymore tests. Leveraged and inverse funds are used to control risk in my portfolios.
Taking them away only puts my investments at a greater risk. Please give me and other investors like me Freedom To Choose.
Thank you
How is owning a security a bigger threat than owning a firearm? Currently I dont have to take any tests or demonstrate any knowledge to own a firearm or ammunition, and any risks involved with gun ownership the government considers acceptable. So how exactly does these new rules protect me? I dont see how the government can tell me Im competent enough to own a firearm and ammunition but not a
I use leveraged and inverse funds as a protection hedge and to enhance returns. I am fully capable of understanding leverage and inverse funds as well as risks. I don't need a special test before investing in these funds safely. I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family, not regulators. Public investments should be available to all of the
Dear FINRA,
I oppose restrictions on my rights to invest in public investments. As an investor I should have variety in choices of investments and not be limited by regulators or have to pass a test to be able to invest in a security. I understand leveraged and inverse funds and have been trading them since last year. Again, the leveraged and inverse funds help diversify my portfolio. Please
The existing investment instruction and terms are sufficient. People at legel age are able to consider rationally and independently if they can bear the risks. It is unreasonable to ask people do tests especially there are a large group of people already has experience of investing leveraged and inverse ETF products, not to mention how unfair it is to restrain investment activities by how much
N/A
Investors should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds
