Displaying 3041 - 3050 of 9026 Results
There is no reason to impose this restriction. Investors are already accepting risks when opening an account and imposing harsher restrictions only serves to make average investors have bigger hurdles to cross when it comes to returns over a long period of time. The free market should remain free, passing an arbitrary test does not mean someone is a better investor.
Stop putting more
I oppose regulations that limit small investors ability to invest in leveraged and inverse funds. This is a basic principle of fairness. Should these vehicles only be available to high net worth individuals? There is enough special privilege already in the system that rigs the system against individual investors. This rule amounts to further theft.
I oppose any restrictions on my right to invest in public investments. I do not agree that any special process like passing a test to be able to invest in public securities and inverse leveraged funds. Making investors try and prove their ability to protect my investments puts a restriction on my ability to secure my entire portfolio of investments. I am NOT ALIGNED with this notice as it creates
Dear Regulators,
Individuals should be free to invest how they wish, without regulator claiming they know better. The legislation to ban certain types of trading to individuals limits their freedoms. There should be no expectation of tests, net worth, etc. The only requirement should be if someone has money, and wants to invest it. Leveraged funds and inverse funds are the only option for some
Sir,
I invest about 25 Million Dollars as an individual investor and I have more than 25 years of experience in investing using complex strategies (Leverage Funds/ Inverse Funds/ Call & PUT Options, etc)
All the above mentioned strategies are important for overall balanced approach to Investment and I would not like it to be taken away, neither do I want to take tests to be granted
The investor not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
Investor like me shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am
capable of
These products need to stay available for an overall portfolio and everyone should have access to these funds. They already disclose enough information for an investor to make a sound decision on the product and be aware of all the good and bad that comes with that product. There is no need to add additional regulations to these products especially requiring the investor to take a test. There are
I shouldn't have to pass some kind of test to invest in inverse funds. I am educated and capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds, their risks, and their ability to hedge my investments when used as a part of my overall portfolio strategy.
I originally used these leveraged funds in several of my watch list portfolios where they outperformed the portfolios without applying
I, and not regulators, should be able to choose the public
investments that are right for you and your family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
Investors should not have to go through any special process such as passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. Explain that you are capable of
It is the responsibility of regulators to ensure funds are well managed, safe from fraud and equally accessible to all investors. It is not the responsibility of regulators to determine which funds specific investors are allowed to purchase. Regulators must not require any tests or assessments in an effort to "weed out" or discriminate against investors. Cryptocurrency funds are an