Displaying 3011 - 3020 of 9026 Results
Regulators should not choose the public investments that are right for me and my family - and my portfolio. Public investments should be available to all of the public. You shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks
I oppose changing the current regulations regarding investment in leveraged funds.
Public investment should remain open to the public.
I am capable of making and accepting my investment choices without the need of special tests or permissions instituted by your agency.
Leverage funds play a key role in my portfolio and I am the one who makes these decisions. I dont desire or want changes made
I should have the freedom and flexibility to choose the investments that are right for me and my family. Public investment should be available for any investor, not just the privileged few. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged
On January 4, 2010, FINRA will implement redesigned versions of the S101 and S106 Regulatory Element Programs in an effort to improve and keep the Continuing Education Program current and relevant. The S101 Regulatory Element Program(i.e., the General Program) is required for all registration categories except for Series 6 or supervisory/principals. The S106 Regulatory Element Program is required
Dear FINRA Regulators,
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and
I definitely do not want FINRA to make any changes to Proposed Rule #22-08. Public traded funds need to remain public. This almost reminds me that I may not be ELITE enough to participate in what has always been available to the public. The thought of being tested to see if I know enough about these funds is ludicrous. I don't believe that FINRA should be awarded this kind of control over
On Monday, December 2, 2019, FINRA will expand the summary firm data relating to over-the-counter (OTC) equity trading that FINRA publishes on its website.
Beginning on December 2, 2019, FINRA will provide:
new monthly aggregate block-size trading data for OTC trades in NMS stocks executed outside an alternative trading system (ATS) on a one-month delayed basis; and
aggregate non-ATS volume
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family, including the leveraged and inverse funds. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of
I want to relay my concerns about the referenced regulatory notice.
I do not believe any incremental regulatory requirements should be placed on leveraged investment instruments. I disagree with the notion of testing, thresholds, net worth requirements and so on. These are public instruments that should be made available to all. Firms selling these products are quite clear communicating the
To Whom It May Concern,
Me not regulators should be able to choose the public
investments that are right for me and my family.
Public investments should be available to all of the public,
not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before I can invest in public securities,
like leveraged and inverse funds.
I am