Displaying 29121 - 29130 of 34835 Results
I used to be in the investment business and earned a Series 7 with a test score of 93. Even without that, as long as an investment is thoroughly explained, the right to purchase it should not be restricted. I've made plenty of investing mistakes, but it's all about freedom; and too many people in positions of authority want to control every aspect of our lives. They and the education
Do Not stop my trading in invest in leveraged & inverse funds. That's my freedom to trade.
It is my right to invest as I choose with the hard earned monies I have labored to acquire. Regulators should not have authority to pick and choose who can benefit from leveraged investment strategies. Public investments should be available to ALL, not just the privileged.
Hello, I feel that I - not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. Regards, Julia Krickhahn
I believe imposing restrictions on these types of trades will only hurt those who have small funds as those who have a large amount of funding will gain more power creating an unbalanced market and there for these restrictions should not be put into place
I oppose the new ru.
These financial insteuments are vitally important for an informed and sophisticated investor to use for the retail investor. Perhaps vetting new investors is a better option. For any investor with years of experience, these leveraged instruments are vital and must be kept.
Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategy to help hedge against loss during economic downturns. I know that my portfolio is well protected with these hedges and I have a right to invest in these funds. The privileged shouldn't be the only people that can protect their portfolio from loss. These restrictions should not be put in place.
I prefer to make my own decisions regarding my investment options. I use leveraged funds carefully.