I oppose adding restrictions to trading financial products deemed "complex" because people are ultimately responsible for managing their own money. Regulating these products would make it harder for people to maximize their returns, hedge, and speculate. Speculation is much maligned, but ultimately, it keeps markets efficient and people should have ready access to high-risk/high
We shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before we can invest in public securities,
like leveraged and inverse funds. We are capable of
understanding leveraged and inverse funds
and their risks. We do not need these measures
imposed on us.
Please note that leveraged and inverse funds help
protect our investments.
I've worked my whole life to get where I am. I've got a little to invest and try to grow. I made the money, it should be ME to make my own decisions. Win or loose, this is my right to do what I choose to do with it.
That [REDACTED]. Stop violating my rights. I have the Constitutional right to buy what I want without being subjected to your idiotic,unconstitutional [REDACTED] and violation of my rights. You all work for me and the rest of America it's Time for you to do what you are told to do by the people not what you want to do or what you are paid under the table out of site to do that goes against
Dear Regulators!
It would be a huge mistake to limit investors abilities to use the various leveraged and inverse leveraged ETFs currently available as components of a balanced asset allocation. For long-term and short-term investors these vehicles have an important role to play in both mitigating risk and providing capital appreciation. Please do not put addition burdens on small retail
I fit all the normal requirements for suitability to buy such things as ProShares. I owned AGQ in my Roth IRA. I am a retired VP Investments from a regional brokerage firm, sufficient net worth and income, full options trading experience and qualification and was forced by the compliance guy where my account is currently to divest this security due to its complex and risky nature and the upcoming
I find it very concerning that FINRA is proposing to interfere in my usage of leveraged or inverse funds and ETFs. My investment firm's websites already give me ample warning about my risks using these investments, and they do it every time I consider making such a purchase. So your heavily burdensome proposed requirements would only be an unnecessary intrusion into my process of
The federal government should tend to its business and stay out of we the peoples business.
If you dont have any business, then you should be eliminated!!!
The less government, the better of we are.
All 3 branches should study the Constitution and do what our very wise forefathers laid out for them to do.
There are too many agencies that should not be be part of our government.
I oppose limitations to be able to invest in leveraged funds such as ProShares funds. You should not be able to limit my ability to invest in what I see fit.
To the SEC:
Please do NOT adopt the proposed rule!
I have included leveraged and inverse leveraged funds in my portfolio for well over a decade. I understand the concept of volatility drag and as an antidote, I employ modified dollar-cost averaging to lower my cost basis.
It seems criminally unfair for one branch of the government the Fed to create an overinflated market, only to have another
