Displaying 27811 - 27820 of 34835 Results
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I am able to invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I have been capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. Perhaps you want to impose these on new investors, however, I do not need these measures imposed on me and it would take away a ton of tax revenue if this
Everyone, regardless of the size of their income or social standing should have the right to invest in anything they so desire.
Your proposed new regulations are totally unnecessary and only puts a burden on both investors and investment services. Notice of the risks are amply provided at this time and further action is useless and a waste of time.
The members of Congress might better POLICETHEIR OWN ILLEGALINVESTING HABITS Ms.PELOSI for example LEAVE THE AVERAGE WORKINGMAN INVESTORS ALONE
I would like to oppose this rule. In my opinion, investors who are investing in these complex products know the risks already. Also brokerage companies let us informed of the risks. Whenever i try to buy a leverage fund, my broker shows warnings at multiple places in big bold red letters during the transaction. I suspect if someone "accidentally" bought these leveraged funds. I
Do not reduce my ability to invest as I want. I need free choice.If I want to take risks that is my choice.
Dear Sirs/Madams,
As a retail investor, this is a terrible idea. Brokerages already offer nearly unlimited exposure to leverage with options, futures, futures options, and other products; not to mention 4x margin availability to even relatively small account-holders. Restricting access to some polymorph of accredited investors will only deprive informed retail investors of one of their few hedge
I am an American citizen. I have the right to make my own choices.
I OPPOSE RESTRICTIONS TO MY RIGHT TO INVEST!
stop regulating what we do with our money now.