I believe imposing restrictions on these types of trades will only hurt those who have small funds as those who have a large amount of funding will gain more power creating an unbalanced market and there for these restrictions should not be put into place
These financial insteuments are vitally important for an informed and sophisticated investor to use for the retail investor. Perhaps vetting new investors is a better option. For any investor with years of experience, these leveraged instruments are vital and must be kept.
Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategy to help hedge against loss during economic downturns. I know that my portfolio is well protected with these hedges and I have a right to invest in these funds. The privileged shouldn't be the only people that can protect their portfolio from loss. These restrictions should not be put in place.
I prefer to make my own decisions regarding my investment options. I use leveraged funds carefully.
So before the fed corrects the market finra wants to keep the communism status quo intact by controlling who can and can not make money?
It's on the diligence of the investor to know what they are investing in. If you believe buying and selling leveraged ETF's is too risky for investors what about regular stocks? Should retail investors take tests to see if they can trade public securities? The market is speculation, there is always risk.
Hello, I oppose restrictions to my right to invest. Regulators should not be able to restrict the public from investing. We investors are making informed and educated decisions based on market factors and the economy. It is rude to assume regular investors are not 'smart' enough to make their own decisions. It would be fundamentally un-American in all that is business to impose these
I should have a right to invest what I believe is appropriate to me. I should take my own responsibility on my own wealth.
