Displaying 2671 - 2680 of 9026 Results
I have rich investment experiences and understand risk of Leveraged ETF, it is IMPORTANT for my investment, such as spends less cash to holding expected percent of securities. it also help hedge of risk in between my securities holding.
I hope I can free trade it in future. I want NOT passing any test before I can invest in public securities.
Please allow my research and judgement to decide the best investment vehicles for my money. All tools require effort and time to learn. None are more complex than others. ETPs like Inverse ETF funds go the opposite direction of a benchmark. How is this difficult to understand? In fact, in my ROTH IRA this is the safest means to hedge against the market going lower. I don't want to
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for you and your family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I have a degree from Harvard and don't need to pass a test to invest in public securities. I utilize leveraged and inverse funds as an important yet carefully managed and small part of my portfolio.
I have been investing in leveraged funds for over 10 years and I am aware of the risks. Leveraged funds help my portfolio perform better with higher returns. I do not need any classes or tests or certificates to trade these funds. If you do then you should make every single investor in the market do the same.
The additional rules proposed by FINRA does not protect the public as whole, rather only protects a small few that wants additional control on the free market. We are currently able to trade knowing the risks and rewards - the people do not need high net worth, special classes / tests, or additional government regulations imposed on us.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. Myself and the public are capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategies. I do not need these measures imposed on me.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before you can invest in public securities,
like leveraged and inverse funds. I am
capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds
and their risks. I do not
need these measures imposed on me. Also, Leveraged and inverse funds are important to your
investment strategies.
Dear Sir,
I do not want my rights to invest impeded or impinged upon by this legislation. I do not want to suffer through cooling off periods where I can not invest or arbitrary finance or investment limits placed on my investment habits nor forced education and testing standards placed on me as the investor.
Thank you,
R Beliles
Investors should be able to choose what public investments are right for them and investors should not be unreasonably restricted by various tests and hurdles before investing . There should however be warnings messages in plain language for certain funds that have high risk. Warnings, however, should not be road blocks. I do invest in inverse and leveraged funds and understand their risks.
This is poorly conceived. I should be the sole determiner of what I invest my funds in. There is NO LEGITIMATE REASON to regulate my ability to invest in whatever legal assets I choose. I do not need to pass a test, get 3rd party approval or regulatory approval to decide what to invest my own funds in.
Hands off my investment decisions!!!