Displaying 2661 - 2670 of 9026 Results
I not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family.
. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, including cryptocurrency fund as BITO..
FINRA announced today that Derrick Roman, former partner of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC), and Gus Sauter, current member of FINRA’s Investment Committee, have been appointed as public governors on its Board of Governors. In addition, Naureen Hassan, President of UBS Americas and CEO of UBS Holdings, has been appointed as an industry governor to the Floor Member Governor seat.
A listing of general registration, membership, fingerprint processing, qualification examination fees.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process- like passing a test- before you can invest in public securities,
like leveraged and inverse funds. I am fully capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. Ultimately I am the one responsible for the handling of my money, and these measures should not be imposed.
I have been investing in Leveraged and Inverse Funds for the last 8 years. I, not you, the regulators should choose how to invest my money. These Funds are very important to my investment strategy.
I should not have to go thru any special process like passing test before I can invest in publicly traded securities
Hello I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am more than capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. I do not need these measures imposed on me. Thank you, Jim
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me. Public investments should be available to all of the public not just the privileged. I should not have to pass a test to invest in public securities like leveraged and inverse funds. Leveraged and inverse funds are important for me to be able reduce risk in my investment portfolio.
Individual investors should be free to determine their own level of acceptable risk. The responsibility should be on those offering securities to clearly explain the risks and in individual investors to accept those risks. Individual investors should not be required to pass tests or meet a bar of net worth in order to purchase publicly available securities.
This is an unfair rule preventing ordinary investors from taking full advantage of the market. As a graduate of law school, I am perfectly capable of making these types of decisions without being forced to take burdensome tests. There should be no such requirement provided I am offering no advice to others about investment. I strongly oppose this measure.
I feel I should be able to choose the public investments that are best for my portfolio. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks without having to take a test to trade them. These funds are an important part of my strategy with less risk than trading commodity futures, for example. Thanks for your consideration.