Displaying 2651 - 2660 of 9026 Results
I think this is [REDACTED]. I should be able to invest my money were I chose. I am the one taking the risks. They need to keep their hand out of my public right to do this. If I wanted to go to school and pass tests to invest. I can make those choices for myself. Don't make any changes. This sounds like [REDACTED]
I strongly oppose any attempt to limit the right to invest in products identified as leveraged, inverse or other investments designed to seek enhanced returns.
These investment products should not just be limited to "privileged" parties but should remain in the public domain available to all investors.
ANY means tests to purchase or invest in these funds should not be required.
I am competent to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. I should not have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding these funds and their risks and I do not need regulators to impose restrictions on me.
Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my
investment strategies. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am
capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds
and their risks. I do not need these measures imposed on me!
I have employed Leveraged ETFs for the past year without difficulty or undue financial damage and would like to have continued access. I did not (and do not now) have problems understanding the nature of these investments and do not want to pass a test to continue using them, especially by some person or automated "grader" that is not personally acquainted with me.
As a retail investor, I should be able to choose which investments I want to invest my money in (including leveraged and inverse funds), based on my own research and risk assessment. I don't see any need for additional tests and reading material Current prospectus and details are more than sufficient and no further checks and restrictions are needed.
Please keep "complex" investment vehicles open to all of the public, not just to those with the most money to spend. Requiring tests and other hoops to jump through are not necessary. In this market, inverse ETFs are very important to prevent losses from holding standard equities. Inverse funds are essential to all in the difficult market conditions we find ourselves in now.
No! We do not need further restrictions, permissions from mommy, brokers or big government to invest. We do not need tests or any other restrictive device. Markets are efficient, most investors know the risks and will allocate their resources accordingly. A clearly worded prospectus that explains the risks specific to that instrument are all thats needed.
We shouldn't have to go through any special tests before we invest our money in public securities of our choice, like leveraged and inverse funds that we trade frequently. we understand leveraged and inverse funds and their associated risks. We do not need any restrictions imposed upon us.
Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. People shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before they can invest in public securities like leveraged and inverse funds.
Leveraged and inverse funds are an important investment strategy.
I do not need these measures imposed on me.