As a mathematician working in the area of mathematical finance with an in-depth understanding of the complexities of leveraged ETFs, I am very familiar with how they work. In my experience, the companies that manage these funds, such as Direxion, are very clear and transparent about the workings and risks associated with leveraged ETFs. In my opinion there should not be any barriers to market
I often make use of "complex" investments for trades, including leveraged and inverse funds. No one is forcing me to make these decisions. I am capable of making these choices and am responsible enough to accept the consequences. I'm a small investor/trader and would be seriously hurt if you change the current rules. Please do not add unnecessary, complicated regulations to trading
Please don't take away leveraged and inverse ETF's
People are aware of the risks.
We don't want your in put on this.
I do not agree with the regulation money and currency or what in the same if it holds a value than it should be considered to be a stable currency and there should be regulations on what makes you fit into that bracket after your stock or currency has not stayed above a certain price 4 2 annual terms or something like that
To FINRA,
There's an old saying " buyer beware". It's my responsibility to do my " due diligence" It is un-american to tell people what they can and can't invest in. It's not your job to prevent me from making a bad decision. That role might belong to my wife, but not to you or anyone else.
It IS the job of regulatory
The elevation of chosen investors, creating the “accredited investor” designation that can be achieved solely on the measure of a one's wealth or income was an egregious, unmistakable step toward oligarchy. With existing rules already in place, governmental agencies are now using a wealth/income-based designation to reserve high-risk, high-reward investment opportunities and products for
You have made this notice complex. I only agree with giving the investor more information 2c. If you want to regulate something make Companies that issue a K-1 to shareholders be required to use a stock symbol ending in K.
Please quit trying to save me from myself. You've already placed more than enough restrictions on the small investor to put him at a significant disadvantage.
As Shareholders of this type of investment, we take our risks under no pressure to buy or own the leverage and inverse fund. I'm concerned about the special process or regulation, if it ever becomes the reality, it restricts our choice or the freedom to strategize our investment. Given the fact that the specific ETF, a high leverage investment type is high risk and we accepted it. If
