Comments: stop interrupting the retail trader. Just leave the leverage ETFs alone ! Thank you
We understand the risks involved, only invest what you can afford to lose.
Investors not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for our financial goals. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. Leveraged and Inverse funds are an important part of the choices available to investors as we manage our portfolios, and there should be no restrictions on them. Thank you, Glenn Hofmann
1.) Limiting investment opportunities to those with high net worth is inherently un-American and is borderline predatory on those who would be excluded from making these investment plays.
2.) Leveraged and inverse funds are crucial to my short and long term investment strategies. Information and notices are provided with these, and should continue to be. Expanding information requirements is a
Comments: leave the Leverage ETFs alone !
Comments: I am concerned with the enhanced rules regarding "complex products". There seems to be a lack of faith by FINRA in investor knowledge about these products, when in reality, investors are capable and responsible to educate themselves on products they invest in. There is a huge variety of platforms available for investor education, and product choice should not be
Comments: stop interrupting the retail trader. Just leave the leverage ETFs alone ! Thank you
It is vital that I have access to inverse funds (not leveraged inverse funds) to manage my personal asset allocation. I managed money professionally for 25 years and am well aware of the attendant risks. Please do not restrict my ability to use these investment vehicles! Thanks....
Comments: I have been trading stocks and options for more than three decades and believe that education of the public and a understanding of the complexity of that asset should be explained prior to purchase of that asset.
I oppose restrictions
on my right to invest in public investments.
