Comments:Leveraged ETFs allows me to invest in a sector, thus avoid trying to pick a stock. I am not a professional investor. I sincerely request that you not take that option away from me. Thank you. Robert George
Comments: Please do not limit access to leveraged and inverse funds. They are valuable tools for navigating the turbulent market. Please do not take away one of the few channels the retail trade has to engage with market.
Comments:Please leave the Drexion inverse ETFs alone. They provide a valuable investment when Markets are failing such as right now.
I think leveraged ETFs should be eliminated. However, I think 1x inverse ETFs are fine. That is just shorting and I think 1x long or 1x short should both be allowed.
Comments: Persons buying, investing, in leveraged funds should understand what they are buyng--which is true of any stock or ETF. If they buy without research of the fund or ETF, then they have a bigger problem that will not be solved by regulation. J. Baldwin Smith
Comments:Please keep allowing investors to trade L&I products as we really like these products and do not add additional restrictions on trading these products. These products are hallmark of free democratic society and they should be allowed to be traded freely. Thanks for your kind consideration...
Comments: As an active private investor I understand the criticality of having access to inverse and leveraged ETFs. These products enable long term, full cycle investors to take advantage of short-term trends across multiple market segments, providing diversification and risk management of my portfolio. I would hope that FINRA allows for an expansion of these types of investing products in the
There currently is already a process at some brokerages that involves signing a special form to enable trading of L&I ETFs. There is no need to go beyond this. This issue needs to be treated consistently with margin trading: both are a form of leverage. The level of effort/disclosure for both should be similar.
