FINRA Requests Comment on a Proposal to Disseminate Additional Securitized Products and to Reduce the Reporting Time Frame for These Products
SUGGESTED ROUTING*
Internal Audit
Operations
Systems
Trading
*These are suggested departments only. Others may be appropriate for your firm.
As of February 10, 1989, the following 26 issues joined the NASDAQ National Market System, bringing the total number of issues in NASDAQ/NMS to 2,880
This is my second letter to you. We dont need more government regulation on investing. I am a small investor with an IRA. I have a small amount to invest outside of the IRA. However I choose not to invest that money because capital gains tax would eat up any profit. If you want to help the small investor then give us a $10,000 exemption for short and long term capital gains tax in each tax year.
TO: All NASD Members and Level 2 and Level 3 Subscribers
On Tuesday, April 15, 1986, 37 issues are scheduled to join the NASDAQ National Market System, bringing the total number of issues in NASDAQ/NMS to 2,307. These 37 issues, which will begin trading under real-time trade reporting, are entering NASDAQ/NMS pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission's criteria for voluntary
Direxion put out a request for investors in their products to comment on this proposed action. I figure it would be better to avoid going through their portal. The consensus seems to be that the proposed action, in its details, would ban most investors from purchasing inverse and leveraged funds. These comments apply to exchange traded inverse and leveraged funds, and not similar products that
I completely disagree with any government attempt to further regulate my choice of investments. It is MY business, not yours. Assets involved are MINE, not yours. Why dont you go regulate yourselves? Out of existence preferably.
The Cybersecurity and Technology Governance section of the 2023 Report on FINRA’s Examination and Risk Monitoring Program (the Report) informs member firms’ compliance programs by providing annual insights from FINRA’s ongoing regulatory operations, including (1) regulatory obligations and related considerations, (2) observations and effective practices, and (3) additional resources.
The options for rich people to invest are already significantly more than everyone else, why would we restrict one more option. I understand what I'm doing in leveraged asset classes and the risks they contain.
Using leveraged funds is an important part of our investment strategy. We use the funds in an appropriate manner and hedge them with other assets. We specifically request that our opportunity to use these vehicles is not regulated away.
Almost all of investors are already well aware of the meaing of investing in leverged or inversed efts and no one can or should limit the personal choice for investing with their own money and assets I totally oppose for the FINRA regulatory notice
