As long as its possible to sell a share short - but mark it as long - any additional reporting visibility and / or frequency will be diluted by fraudulent data. The only thing that matters is forcing delivery of securities at settlement. As long as its possible to ftd a security sold and never ever deliver it, while at the same time accepting the money for it - none of the rest of this [REDACTED
5/7/2022 ..Trying to freeze the market at a high - unrealistic price - will only destroy them. Lower prices are a good thing. It allows mostly young people - starting out - to establish a position at a better - more fair/value - price.
Have you noticed that markets go up and down? You should welcome vigorous price discovery.
Short sellers and inverse funds are the only force in the market that
I would just like to add to the regulators that if I'd known how many trillions of dollars the Fed was pumping into the stock market in 2009, 2010, 2011, etc., there is no way I would have been short 3x's if it was public. It was not public and that's a betrayal of the public trust. You are at fault for not making that corporate welfare policy public. You should be prosecuted for
Hello,
Everyone should be free to invest and take risks. I'm all for full disclosure. For example, disclose Point by point:
1, These are high risk investments.
2. The stock market goes up most of the time. Betting against it is risky.
3. They (some) lose value if held overnight.
I have made over 25% this year using these type of funds and wish to be able to continue. I own a
Leveraged funds are a stalwart of my investment strategy. If these are no longer available I will lose my ability to invest. These give a means for the small investor to have the ability to make income when the market is in a bear position. They also give a non-positioned way to income off a bull position as these are non-specific ways to invest in a diverse market. They simply follow they S
I have done very well using leveraged funds. If you merely buy low and sell high, you can make far more money. It is easier and simpler that using options, for a small fee I let the fund do that. I also like inverse funds, which provides market liquidity and it is similar to selling short, but again easier for me. Please let me decide what, where, and how to invest. Please let me and my family
I as an individual investor should be able to choose the investments that are right for me and my family, not just for the "high net-worth" accredited one-percenters. I should have to go through a process of passing a test before I can invest in public securities unless the government is willing to train individual investors like me and administer the test free of charge.
Investors should be free to make their own decisions in where they would like to invest their money, short or long term, however risky it may be, so long as the fund is honest. Small caps or OTC is just as volatile and risky if not more. Options trading is way more risky than leveraged ETFs as well. You limit retail's tools to hedge or make large gains by stopping us from using these.
I believe I have the right to use leveraged or inverse ETFs as part of my investment strategy. Since shorting stocks is not allowed in a retirement fund, inverse ETFs give me the freedom to take advantage of situations where market conditions are unfavorable. Likewise, options can be used at far greater risk than leveraged ETFs. That said, some might enjoy the use of options to hedge a large
What are you doing and why. This type of investment should not be only used by traders on wallstreet. All things are learned and anyone can learn how to use different investment strategies. WHY let only bankers steal on the short. This is obvious what you are trying to do. Protect bankers money. Well, you should BE working for us, any time you restrict what regular people can do you are screwing
