I understand you are considering passing a bill to limit my ability to invest in certain funds. I am against any bills that would limit that ability. One of the restrictions would be on leveraged funds for which I have several. Your restrictions will cause them to loose great value and that is not something I want affecting my personal wealth.
I understood the risks involved before I bought
It is the sole responsibility of the investor to choose securities that meets their assessed risk tolerance. It is the responsibility of the securities and brokerages to accurately publish the risks and potentials for their products. Thus, adding regulations beyond these fundamental purposes skew the landscape to play favoritism and hurt the market. Demanding a test or license or education
The risks of investing are inherent in any fund or security. That is something made known when beginning to invest and heavily emphasized in literature to those considering investing. It's my responsibility as a investor to vet and understand the products I'm investing in. As part of that vetting process, I use leverage to manage my downside risk. It also constitutes a very
Thanks for taking the time to read this. I am against further restrictions against smaller investors. I should not have to take any additional classes or have any special authorization to invest in leveraged or inverse funds. I understand that these are higher risk investments and I believe that I have the same right to trade them as any large corporate investor. I shouldn't have to
FINRA President and CEO Robert Cook, Chairman Bill Heyman, Board members and FINRA staff provide updates on the December 2017 FINRA Board of Governors meeting, including discussions around FINRA’s finances and financial transparency, 2017 accomplishments, enterprise risk management and more.
<p>Applicability of Rule 3040 to investment advisory activities of an individual who is dually registered as a registered representative and a registered investment advisor.</p>
Comments:I am an investment professional and I am an individual investor. I encourage full disclosure of the function, structure and behavior of leveraged and inverse products. However, I am strongly against the limiting of access and onerous processes that an investor would experience while investing their funds. I am an educated and fully understand the risks of these investments. I have been
I am 71 years old. I have been investing in stocks bonds and especially ETFs since I was 31. My experience is that leveraged ETFs an inverse leverage ETFS Have allowed me to safely invest for 40 years. Without these investment options I believe my long-term financial situation in retirement is at risk. I understand the risks of these investments and invest wisely. I dont need help from regulators
I strongly oppose SEC Proposed Rule #S7-24-15, which is to unreasonably restrict my right and benefit to make the best of cryptocurrency ETFs as one of core segments of my ETF portofolio. With the recent growing liquidity for cryptocurrency, I cannot sense any peculiar risk characteristics in cryptocurrency ETFs, compared to more commodity ETFs or FX ETFs. Also, with the recent jump in inflation
What makes the American Financial Markets so exceptional is they are the most innovative markets on earth. What this means is anyone with sound knowledge about a product is willing to take the risk only because such products are available and they trust the provider of those products to do the right thing to closely mirror the benchmark index as much as possible. If you take out access to these