Hello,
I have employed inverse Etf funds for several years and understand the risk entirely.
Mostly I invest in them as a moderate defensive hedge my investments, and occassionly to add to returns. Due to the risk I never hold inverse stocks overnight.
WIth my experience and understanding, I for one see no need to regulate these vehicles.
Sincerely,
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for my investment practices and risk tolerance. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just a small percentage of the total pie. Also, I know that I am perfectly capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks, and as such, regulators should not impose these measures upon me.
It is discriminatory to allow certain individuals to invest in some security classes while restricting others. Individual investors should have the freedom to do as they deem appropriate for their own risk tolerances. Leveraged and inverse funds allow all investors to have a diversified risk profile which is important regardless of total net worth.
I have rich investment experiences and understand risk of Leveraged ETF, it is IMPORTANT for my investment, such as spends less cash to holding expected percent of securities. it also help hedge of risk in between my securities holding.
I hope I can free trade it in future. I want NOT passing any test before I can invest in public securities.
I am outraged that you are trying to tell me what I can or can't invest in. Leveraged funds are a critical part of my investment strategy to limit risk. I am fully aware of the risks using inverse funds.Furthermore, they are an important part of having market checks and balances. I would urge you to not place any restrictions on these funds.
This makes absolutely no sense to limit and create such a hurdle regarding leveraged and inverse funds. Investments have risks associated with them, and the funds' and ETFs' prospectuses clearly show and demonstrate the risks associated to them. There is no difference than buying a regular fund on margin to mimic the leveraged return. Let investors invest how we'd like
Please do not impose additional regulations on inverse and leveraged funds. These are valuable tools used by investors to balance their portfolios, and also to hedge against macro economic risk. Without the benefit of these funds the ability to hedge the risk in my investment portfolio would be greatly diminished. Please let investors decide what they should invest in.
I regularly enjoy being able to trade in leveraged funds as a limited part of my investment strategies. I am able to afford risks associated with such trading and find the existing information and warnings supplied by Fidelity Investments more than sufficient to keep me aware of such risks. Please do not further restrict my use of such funds.
Hello FINRA, I'm s individual investor. I'm facing more risk than the people who work in the Wall Street. We need some tools to hedge our risk. LEVERAGED AND INVERSE FUNDS are very good way to help us to do that. And it's our right. We need to keep it.
I feel I should be able to choose the public investments that are best for my portfolio. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks without having to take a test to trade them. These funds are an important part of my strategy with less risk than trading commodity futures, for example. Thanks for your consideration.