Dear Sirs, I believe our ability to buy inverse ETFs should not be limited, for the following reason: Betting against a given stock, fund or commodity is a valid and, mostly, healthy way to establish a fair valuation of such. However, short sales, put options and futures are more dangerous than inverse ETFs, where one's losses are limited to the amount invested.
I am an AMC stockholder. There are a lot of market hijinks going on right now. I would love for you to investigate all the counterfeit shares and naked shorts that are ruining the natural squeeze of this stock. The market needs to be cleaned up and made fair for all....not just the rich. Thank you for your time.
This comment is reference proposed FINRA Regulatory Notice # 22-08. I am against any regulation that limits my ability to invest in any mutual fund, ETF or stock. This includes mutual funds and ETFs that are leveraged or work inverse to a particular index. I am capable of understanding the risks, and rewards of these type investments. We do NOT need another regulation! Bill Hiemer
I oppose limitations to block or restrict my investing activities. All stocks have risk and if measures are sought to restrict a certain commodity then i say stop the whole global market trading as well. This is a gross overreach of FINRA to assume this is in the best interest of the investor. Tsla, amzn, nflz, fb, etc are significantly riskier than a leveraed etf based on the broad market.
We should have the freedom to choose the public investment by our own will that are right for ourselves. We shouldnt have to go through any special process before purchasing public securities including cryptocurrency funds. Its very convenient to be able to invest under one brokerage to diversify our portfolio such as stocks, mutual funds, ETFs and cryptocurrency.
As of this date/ ProShares stock is around 23$. Like all stock-you may acknowledge that you can lose money. There should be an understanding that it is suggested that you limit your investment. You may want to request that ProShares send out a letter of understanding of what ProShares is all about and the that the possible investor check mark each paragraph that was read and hopefully
Leveraged ETFs are very helpful financial tool for retail investors. They are important to my investment approach. It provides investors access to a basket of stocks and in general it has protection against short raids by hedge funds. Please keep these important investment options around. DO not make retail investors even more weaker by taking this tool away from them.
Please do not impose more unnecessary burdensome regulations on ordinary investors who are just straightforward buying and selling leveraged funds like any other equity shares in other company stocks.
We sorely need more flexibility in negotiating with the current especially tough market environment as it is, in addition to having to deal with future impractical or feckless political/economic
I understand that Benjamin Franklin started trading stocks in the early days of the republic. Investing in other people's ideas, products, innovations, designs is an essential freedom - though risky it might be - for citizens of this land. Do not meddle with it, thinking we need protection from risk. This tendency to regulate and socially engineer everything will collapse-in on itself and
If I want to risk money that I work hard for on any investment that is my choice. If it goes to 0 that's on me. How about looking into Congress and their "investments'' I do not support this and would rather invest in nothing. The attack on our freedom of speech being attacked is one thing but I'll take every investment I have in the stock market and otherwise and choose
