Government should be set up so that no man has to fear another. Im not afraid of the financial instruments I buy. Im a military spouse and use my understanding of the SQQQ ticker to time my entry and exit from this instrument. Im concerned that I simply will be shut out from investing in a way that has really worked for us and supplemented my husbands shockingly low wage. Please dont allow
I am very much opposed to proposed rule #S7-24-15. As an active investor I strongly object to any legislation or rulings which impede my ability to invest in vehicles which I deem beneficial to me. If we limit or prevent our economic freedoms , our political freedoms will soon be limited as well.
I believe I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. I
It is wrong to limit an investors ability to invest in the future of America is one sees fit. This is not China! I support Capitalism, a concept this country was founded on.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. Explain that you are capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. Tell regulators you do not need these measures imposed on you.
This proposed rule is not necessary or needed. You have no right to tell me what or how to invest my money. Nor do you have the right to quiz me or challenge my investments.
I oppose restrictions to my right to invest by not being allowed to buy leveraged and inverse funds at risk. I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. There should be no special process I have to go through to invest in public securities when I am capable of
Don't impose restrictions on how I choose to invest. And do not require me to take some kind of exam to prove that I'm worthy to invest in inverse and leveraged securities. I choose to invest in these instruments as part of my risk management. I DO NOT want the government telling me that they know best. STAY OUT OF MY INVESTMENT LIFE!
It's ludicrous that such a proposal is being considered. I'm not against regulation, but this is beyond a nanny state. Inverse funds are crucial to my investment strategy, and have proven themselves extremely useful and profitable. Leveraged funds can also be useful. Please listen to the investors - we're not children, and can make our own decisions. Many of us have been doing so
I use inverse ETFs to reduce investment risk by hedging my common stock investments. We don't need additional advantages for the privileged, such as limiting access to these investments. I understand the risks of adverse ETFs and don't need protection. As for others, they may not understand the risks of investing at any time. Should we restrict them, how? Is there no responsibility for
