There are many individual stocks which have been and continue to be more volatile then leveraged stocks.Are you going to regulate them as well. leveraged stocks are safer than borrowing on margin. That is a fact.
we should be able to select and have choices to how we invest
There should be no special process to invest in leveraged or inverse securities - these are important strategies retail investors should have access to
Enough with the paternalistic overreach. Adults should be free to invest the money they have legally earned without regard to class. Having to pass a test to spend your own money is outrageous. Promulgating rules that disadvantage people of lesser means is disgraceful and un-American. This rule change should be rejected.
I oppose your restrictions on my right to invest in public investments!
Please do not take away our ability to invest in inverse funds. I am an average investor. I use as a hedge.
We do not need any federal agency to initiate any more regulations in this area. Federal oversight of finances has led to trillions and trillions and trillions in debt, with zero actual money or assets in the Social Security trust fund. Please, please keep your hands out of this. You have done enough damage already.
I am writing to express my objection to any upcoming restrictions to my right to invest. As an investor, I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Neither FINRA, the SEC or any other agency or NGO knows my situation nor can it decide what is best for me. Further, I should NOT have to go through any special process like passing a test, before I can
Dear FINRA regulators,
I think you have a very difficult task with balancing the need for fairness in securities markets while making sure that bad actors do not prey on unsuspecting individual investors.
I think it is fair to say that leveraged products should not be an investors first choice as a core portfolio product, but I've noticed that many seasoned investors, such as Bill Miller