I am opposed to limiting my ability to invest in stocks of my choosing. Please consider denying an legislation which limits my freedom of choice.
Its our right to buy the stock we want to buy. We will take our own risk.I OPPOSE RESTRICTIONS TO MY RIGHT TO INVEST
Inverse fund are an important check on the stock market. I believe that individual investors, when informed of the risks involved, should be able to choose to invest in these funds.
With all Given rights, I am against imposing any restrictions on my decisions and rights to purchase funds, investments and stocks (BITI).
Thank you
People have a right to choose desired jobs. Such penalities limits rights.People have a place in society of someone finds themselves in the stock market so be it.
I oppose restrictions to my right to invest. I have been investing for years and I have over $300,000 in my portafolio of stock investments
Thank you,
Keep your hands off my investment money. If I have the liberty to gamble it away at a casino, how is that different from losing it in stock markets?
I find that leveraged funds like the ones from ProShares, are safe and well-managed. Investing in the long-term success of the US market is an integral part of the stock market
I am deeply disturbed by the proposed regulation limiting access to leveraged and inverse ETFs (which are publicly-traded securities) to those with high net worth who pass a specialized regulatory exam and then jump through a series of administrative and timing-related hoops.
Leveraged and inverse ETFs are one of the few methods that the little guy has in order to protect his or her investments
I believe that inverse funds are necessary to effectively manage my portfolio. As an individual investor it can be very challenging to hedge against market volatility and large draw-downs in the market. Inside retirement accounts, I have very few tools to hedge my portfolio, shorting and options are generally not allowed. That leaves buying of inverse ETFs as one of the few options to provide
