Displaying 3721 - 3730 of 28154 Results
Dear FINRA Policy Makers: ETFs and complex inverse and leveraged ETFs have now been around for almost two decades. Why do you want to make "enhancements" that are actually are in fact "detractions" for individual investors and put them BACK into a position of not having access to ways to protect their portfolios, use hedging strategies without having significant amount of
I use the inverse leveraged products to hedge my risk. For example, I bought a share of Google upon the advice of a broker acquaintance. I was worried about the upcoming earnings report, but wanted to hold onto my stock for the split coming this Summer. So I bought an inverse leveraged product for a few days to lessen my risk during earnings season. I did have an issue with the ProShares UVXY ETF
We already sign disclosures at brokerages warning us about the potential dangers of leveraged products. This is a huge slap in the face for retail investors and a ton of unnecessary road blocks for us that would separate us even further from institutional investors. The HUGE detrimental affect this would have on me would be insurmountable. I have leveraged ETF positions that are currently in the
More regulation only produces an even great gap between those who are privileged enough to have financial advisors (and therefore access to sophisticated investments), and those who are not. Requiring a certain level of net worth is also a way to silo regular folks from taking advantage of the market. This is not right. People should be trusted to make their own financial decisions.
Comments:Hey [REDACTED]. You seem to be missing the point on the entire industry. You have several ETFS, and mutual funds, which are quite complex, and never accurate about which holdings they have. You have advisors trained to sell packaged products in complex markets that were never meant to be packaged and sold to begin with. Now you pick on directional ETFS like they are any more unsafe or
what about indice volatility rates
SUGGESTED ROUTING*
Senior ManagementLegal & ComplianceResearch
*These are suggested departments only. Others may be appropriate for your firm.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The SEC has approved amendments to Article III, Section 24(b)(2) of the NASD Rules of Fair Practice and the Board of Governors' Interpretation thereunder that conform the definition of "bona fide research" to the
I partially trade with a US broker in order to have more access and freedom in my choice of investment vehicles. Making 'complex' funds only freely accessible to the elite and exorbitantly rich (like in the EU), whilst creating more and more hoops for regular people, will only limit opportunities for regular smaller investors. I should have the freedom to do with my own money as I wish
As long as the investment vehicles are legal, legit, and risk fully documented, I see no issues in letting a typical / average investor make their conscious investment decision. I OPPOSE RESTRICTIONS TO MY RIGHT TO INVEST. As an average investor (Im currently using/ investing in proshare shorts/long 3x etf), I find most information available online and typical financial professionals discussed