For the Public
FINRA Data provides non-commercial use of data, specifically the ability to save data views and create and manage a Bond Watchlist.
For Industry Professionals
Registered representatives can fulfill Continuing Education requirements, view their industry CRD record and perform other compliance tasks.
For Member Firms
Firm compliance professionals can access filings and requests, run reports and submit support tickets.
Churning or Excessive Trading1
FINRA Rule 20102 and IM-2310-2
| Principal Considerations in Determining Sanctions | Monetary Sanction | Suspension, Bar or Other Sanctions |
| See Principal Considerations in Introductory Section | Fine of $5,000 to $110,0003 |
Suspend respondent in any or all capacities for a period of 10 business days to one year. In egregious cases, consider a longer suspension (of up to two years) or a bar. |
1. This guideline also is appropriate for annuity and mutual fund-related violations, including switching.
2. This guideline also is appropriate for violations of MSRB Rule G-17.
3. As set forth in General Principle No. 6, Adjudicators should also order disgorgement.
Communications With the Public—Late Filing; Failing to File1; Failing to Comply With Rule Standards or Use of Misleading Communications2
FINRA Rules 2010 and 22203, and NASD Rules 2210 and 2211(d)
| Principal Considerations in Determining Sanctions | Monetary Sanction | Suspension, Bar or Other Sanctions |
|
See Principal Considerations in Introductory Section Failure to File
1. Whether failure to file was inadvertent.
2. Whether communications with the public were circulated widely without having been filed with the Advertising Regulation Department.
3. Whether an individual respondent failed to notify a supervisor of a communication with the public.
Late Filing
1. Whether late filing was inadvertent.
2. Whether communications with the public were circulated widely before having been filed with the Advertising Regulation Department.
3. Number of days late.
Failure to Comply with Rule Standards/ Misleading
1. Whether violative communications with the public were circulated widely.
|
Failure to File Fine of $1,000 to $22,000. Late Filing Fine of $1,000 to $15,000. Failure to Comply/Misleading Failure to Comply with Rule Standards or Inadvertent Use of Misleading Communications Fine of $1,000 to $29,000. Intentional or Reckless Use of Misleading Communications Fine of $10,000 to $146,000. |
Failure to File In egregious cases, consider imposing, for a definite period, a "pre-use" filing requirement to obtain an FINRA Regulation staff "no objection" letter on proposed communications with the public. Also consider suspending the responsible individual in any or all capacities for up to five business days. Late Filing In egregious cases, consider imposing, for a definite period, a "pre-use" filing requirement to obtain an FINRA Regulation staff "no objection" letter on proposed communications with the public. Also consider suspending the responsible individual in any or all capacities for up to 10 business days. Failure to Comply/Misleading Failure to Comply with Rule Standards In egregious cases, consider suspending the firm with respect to any or all activities or functions for up to one year and thereafter imposing, for a definite period, a "pre-use" filing requirement to obtain FINRA Regulation staff "no objection" letter on proposed communications with the public. Also consider suspending the responsible person in any or all capacities for up to 60 days. Use of Misleading Communications with the Public In cases involving inadvertent use of misleading communications, consider suspending firm with respect to any or all activities or functions for up to six months and thereafter imposing, for a definite period, a "pre-use" filing requirement to obtain a FINRA Regulation staff "no objection" letter on proposed communications with the public. In cases involving intentional or reckless use of misleading communications with the public, consider suspending the firm with respect to any or all activities or functions for up to two years.4 Also consider suspending the responsible person in any or all capacities for up to two years. In cases involving numerous acts of intentional or reckless misconduct over an extended period of time, consider suspending the firm with respect to any or all activities or functions for up to two years, suspending the responsible person in any or all capacities for up to two years, expelling the firm, and/or barring the responsible individual. |
1. Failing to file includes instances in which a respondent files with FINRA Regulation staff a communication with the public in response to a notice from FINRA Regulation staff that a necessary filing had not been made.
2. This guideline is appropriate for disciplinary actions that name as respondents member firms that have violated FINRA rules or associated persons who have circumvented the firm's procedures or violated FINRA rules.
3. This guideline also is appropriate for violations of MSRB Rule G-21.
1. If an Adjudicator is considering suspending a firm's ability to execute transactions in the securities referenced in the violative communications, the Adjudicator should consider the potential ramifications to public investors of such a suspension.
Customer Account Transfer Contracts—Failure to Comply With Rule Requirements
FINRA Rule 118701
| Principal Considerations in Determining Sanctions | Monetary Sanction | Suspension, Bar or Other Sanctions |
|
See Principal Considerations in Introductory Section
1. Consider the nature of the violation-consider the respondent's transfer pattern, the number of days late, and whether respondent was late with delivery or validation.
|
Fine of $1,000 to $15,000. In egregious cases, consider a higher fine of up to $73,000. |
Individual Consider suspending the responsible individual in any or all capacities for up to 30 business days. In egregious cases, consider a lengthier suspension of up to two years. Firm In egregious cases, consider suspending the firm with respect to any or all activities or functions for a period of up to two years. |
1 This guideline also is appropriate for violations of MSRB G-26.
Day-Trading Accounts—Failure to Comply With Risk Disclosure Requirements; Failure Appropriately to Approve an Account for Day Trading; Failure to Preserve Required Day-Trading Records
| Principal Considerations in Determining Sanctions | Monetary Sanction | Suspension, Bar or Other Sanctions |
|
See Principal Considerations in Introductory Section Failure to Comply with Risk Disclosure Requirements
1. Whether the firm failed to provide customer(s) with a risk disclosure statement.
2. Whether the firm provided its customer(s) with an inadequate risk disclosure statement, or furnished the risk disclosure statement to its customer(s) in an untimely manner or a manner not designed to provide actual notice.
3. Whether the firm failed to obtain FINRA approval of an alternative disclosure statement or failed timely to seek FINRA approval.
4. In all cases, consider the nature, quality, and timing of the risk disclosure actually provided to the customer(s).
5. Whether day trading was appropriate for the affected customer(s).
6. The number of affected customers.
Failure Appropriately to Approve an Account for Day Trading
1. Whether the firm permitted the customer(s) to engage in a day-trading strategy without the approval required by the rule.
2. Whether the firm failed to conduct a meaningful review before approving the customer account(s) for a day-trading strategy.
3. Whether the firm's approval of the customer account(s) for a day-trading strategy was inappropriate based on the facts it knew or should have known.
4. The timeliness of the approval of the customer account(s) for a day-trading strategy.
5. Whether engaging in a day-trading strategy was appropriate for the affected customer(s).
6. The number of affected customers.
Failure to Preserve Required Day-Trading Records
1. Whether the firm failed adequately to record its approval of the customer account(s) for day trading.
2. Whether the firm failed adequately to preserve the written customer agreement(s) to refrain from engaging in a day-trading strategy.
3. Whether the failure enabled problematic practices to occur and/or to escape detection.
|
Failure to Comply with Risk Disclosure Requirements Fine of $5,000 to $146,000. Failure Appropriately to Approve an Account for Day Trading Fine of $5,000 to $146,000.1 Failure to Preserve Required Day-Trading Records Fine of $1,000 to $37,000. |
Failure to Comply with Risk Disclosure Requirements Consider suspending the responsible individual in any or all capacities for a period of 10 business days to one year. In egregious cases, particularly cases involving numerous customers, consider suspending for a longer period (of up to two years) or barring the responsible individual and suspending the firm with respect to any or all activities or functions for a period of up to two years. Failure Appropriately to Approve an Account for Day Trading Suspend responsible individual in any or all capacities for a period of 10 business days to one year. Consider suspending member firm with respect to any or all activities or functions for up to one year. In egregious cases, particularly cases involving numerous customers, consider suspending the responsible individual for a longer period (up to two years) or barring the individual. Also consider suspending the member firm for a longer period (of up to two years). Failure to Preserve Required Day-Trading Records In egregious cases, consider suspending the responsible individual in any or all capacities for up to 30 business days and suspending the firm in any or all activities or functions for up to 15 business days. |
1. As set forth in General Principle No. 6, Adjudicators should also order disgorgement.
Discretion—Exercise of Discretion Without Customer's Written Authority
FINRA Rule 2010 and NASD Rule 25101
| Principal Considerations in Determining Sanctions | Monetary Sanction | Suspension, Bar or Other Sanctions |
|
See Principal Considerations in Introductory Section
1. Whether customer's grant of discretion was express or implied.
2. Whether firm's policies and/or procedures prohibited discretionary trading and/or whether the firm prohibited the respondent from exercising discretion in customer accounts.
|
Fine of $2,500 to $15,000.2 | In egregious cases, consider suspending respondent in any or all capacities for 10 to 30 business days. |
1. This guideline also is appropriate for violations of MSRB Rule G-19(d).
2. As set forth in General Principle No. 6, Adjudicators may also order disgorgement.
Guaranteeing a Customer Against Loss
| Principal Considerations in Determining Sanctions | Monetary Sanction | Suspension, Bar or Other Sanctions |
|
See Principal Considerations in Introductory Section
1. Purpose and timing of the guarantee.
2. Whether respondent received a financial benefit from the guaranteed transactions.
|
Fine of $2,500 to $37,000.2 |
Consider suspending individual respondent in any or all capacities for up to 30 business days. In egregious cases, consider a longer suspension (of up to two years) or a bar. Consider suspending member firm with respect to any or all activities or functions for up to 30 business days. In egregious cases, consider a longer suspension (of up to two years) or expulsion. |
1. This guideline also is appropriate for violations of MSRB Rule G-25.
2. As set forth in General Principle No. 6, Adjudicators may also order disgorgement.
Institutional Sales Material—Failing to Establish and Maintain Written Procedures in Compliance With Rule Standards; Failing to Comply With Rule Standards Regarding Recordkeeping
NASD Rule 2211
| Principal Considerations in Determining Sanctions | Monetary Sanction | Suspension, Bar or Other Sanctions |
|
See Principal Considerations In Introductory Section. Failure to Establish and Maintain Written Procedures in Compliance with Rule 2211(b)
1. Whether deficiencies enabled violations to occur and escape detection.
2. Nature, extent, and character of underlying misconduct, if any.
|
Failure to Establish and Maintain Written Procedures in Compliance with Rule 2211(b) Fine of $5,000 to $29,000. |
Failure to Establish and Maintain Written Procedures in Compliance with Rule 2211(b) In egregious cases, consider suspending the responsible individual(s) in any or all capacities for up to one year. In egregious cases, also consider imposing a pre-use filing requirement for institutional sales material and suspending the firm with respect to any or all activities or functions for up to 30 business days or until the firm's written procedures are amended to conform to the requirements of Rule 2211(b). |
|
Failure to Comply with Record-Keeping Requirements of Rule 2211(b)
1. Nature and materiality of inaccurate or missing information.
|
Failure to Comply with Record-Keeping Requirements of Rule 2211(b) Fine of $1,000 to $29,000. In egregious cases, consider a higher fine. |
Failure to Comply with Record-Keeping Requirements of Rule 2211(b) In egregious cases, consider suspending the responsible individual for up to two years and consider suspending the firm in any or all activities or functions for up to 30 days. |
Fraud, Misrepresentations or Material Omissions of Fact
| Principal Considerations in Determining Sanctions | Monetary Sanction2 | Suspension, Bar or Other Sanctions |
| See Principal Considerations in Introductory Section |
Negligent Misconduct Fine of $2,500 to $73,000. Intentional or Reckless Misconduct Fine of $10,000 to $146,000. |
Negligent Misconduct3 Suspend individual in any or all capacities for 31 calendar days to two years. Consider suspending a firm with respect to a limited set of activities for up to 90 days. Intentional or Reckless Misconduct Strongly consider barring an individual. Where mitigating factors predominate, however, consider suspending an individual in any or all capacities for a period of six months to two years. Consider applicable Principal Considerations in determining the duration of a suspension or whether to impose a bar. Consider suspending a firm with respect to any or all activities for up to two years. Where aggravating factors predominate, strongly consider expelling the firm. |
1. This guideline also is appropriate for violations of Sections 10(b) and 15(c)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the applicable rules and regulations thereunder, and MSRB Rules G-17 and G-47.
2. In cases involving misrepresentations and/or omissions as to two or more customers, the Adjudicator may impose a set fine amount per investor rather than in the aggregate. As set forth in General Principle No. 6, Adjudicators may also order disgorgement.
3. This guideline should be applied in cases alleging only a violation of FINRA Rule 2010 or MSRB Rule G-17 if the cause of action in the complaint is based on negligent misrepresentations or negligent material omissions of fact.
Penny Stock Rules—Failure to Comply With Rule Requirements
FINRA Rule 2010 and SEC Rules 15g-l through 15g-9
| Principal Considerations in Determining Sanctions | Monetary Sanction1 | Suspension, Bar or Other Sanctions |
| See Principal Considerations in Introductory Section |
Negligent Misconduct Fine of $5,000 to $146,000. Willful Misconduct Fine of the greater of $146,000 or $5,000 per violative transaction. For egregious misconduct, require firm to offer rescission of violative trades to each customer. |
Negligent Misconduct Consider suspending the firm with respect to any or all activities or functions and/or suspending the responsible individual in any or all capacities for up to two years. Willful Misconduct Consider suspending the firm with respect to any or all activities or functions and/or suspending the responsible individual in any or all capacities for up to two years. In egregious cases, bar the responsible individual and/or expel the firm. |
1. As set forth in General Principle No. 6, Adjudicators should also order disgorgement.
Pricing—Excessive Markups/Markdowns and Excessive Commissions
FINRA Rule 2010, NASD Rule 2440 and NASD IM-24401
| Principal Considerations in Determining Sanctions | Monetary Sanction | Suspension, Bar or Other Sanctions |
|
See Principal Considerations in Introductory Section
1. Whether respondent dominated and controlled the market in the subject security or securities.
2. Whether respondent (registered representative) had discretion as to the amount of markups, markdowns or commissions on each trade.
|
Fine of $5,000 to $146,000 plus (if restitution is not ordered) the gross amount of the excessive markups, markdowns, or excessive commissions. Consider suspending individual respondent in any or all capacities for up to 30 business days and requiring demonstrated corrective action with respect to the firm's markup/markdown policy or commission policy. | In egregious cases, consider suspending individual respondent in any or all capacities for up to two years or barring individual. For the firm, consider suspending with respect to any or all activities or functions for up to two years or expelling the firm. |
1. This guideline also is appropriate for violations of MSRB Rule G-30.
Research Analysts and Research Reports—Failing to Comply With Rule Requirements Regarding (1) Relationships Between Research Department and Investment Banking Department; (2) Compensation for Research Analysts; and (3) Relationships Between Research Analysts and Subject Companies1
NASD Rules 2711(b), 2711(c), 2711(d), 2711(e), 2711(j)
| Principal Considerations in Determining Sanctions | Monetary Sanction | Suspension, Bar or Other Sanctions |
|
See Principal Considerations in Introductory Section.
1. Whether misconduct resulted from negligence or intentional/ reckless behavior.
2. Whether misconduct also resulted in publication of research reports that omitted material information or contained misleading information.
3. Whether evidence suggested systemic problems or widespread abuse in the firm.
|
Negligent Misconduct Fine of $5,000 to $146,000. Intentional/Reckless Misconduct Fine of $10,000 to $292,000. In egregious cases, consider a larger fine. |
Negligent Misconduct Consider suspending the responsible individual(s) in any or all capacities for up to 30 business days. Intentional/Reckless Misconduct Responsible Individual— Suspend responsible individual(s) in any or all capacities for a period of 60 business days to two years. In egregious cases, suspend individual(s) for a longer period or bar individual(s). Firm— Consider suspending firm's research activities for a period of one month to two years. Consider requiring firm to retain an independent consultant to review and make recommendations regarding the adequacy of the firm's supervisory procedures regarding research activities. In cases involving violative relationships between a firm's research department and investment banking department, consider suspending the firm's investment banking activities for a period of three months to two years. In egregious cases, suspend firm in any or all activities or functions for up to two years or expel the firm. |
1. For violations of Rule 2711(i) Supervisory Procedures, Adjudicators should refer to the guideline for Supervision—Failure to Supervise.
Research Analysts and Research Reports—Failing to Comply With Rule Requirements Regarding (1) Restrictions on Publishing Research Reports and Public Appearances of Research Analysts; (2) Restrictions on Personal Trading of Research Analysts; and (3) Disclosure Requirements for Research Reports and Public Appearances of Research Analysts1
NASD Rules 2711(f), 2711(g), 2711(h)
| Principal Considerations in Determining Sanctions | Monetary Sanction | Suspension, Bar or Other Sanctions |
|
For All Violations See Principal Considerations in Introductory Section
1. Whether misconduct resulted from negligence or intentional/ reckless behavior.
2. Whether misconduct also resulted in publication of research reports that omitted material information or contained misleading information.
3. Whether evidence suggested systemic problems or widespread abuse in the firm.
|
Failure to Comply With Restrictions on Personal Trading of Research Analysts (Rule 2711(g)) Fine of $5,000 to $73,000.2 In egregious cases, consider a higher fine. Failure to Comply With Restrictions on Publishing Research Reports, Restrictions on Public Appearances of Research Analysts and Disclosure Requirements for Research Reports and Public Appearances (Rule 2711 (f) and (h)) Negligent Misconduct Fine of $5,000 to $146,000. Intentional/Reckless Misconduct Fine of $10,000 to $292,000. In egregious cases, consider a larger fine. |
Failure to Comply With Restrictions on Personal Trading of Research Analysts (Rule 2711(g)) Suspend individual in any or all capacities for a period of 10 business days to one year. In egregious cases, consider a longer suspension or a bar. Failure to Comply With Restrictions on Publishing Research Reports, Restrictions on Public Appearances of Research Analysts and Disclosure Requirements for Research Reports and Public Appearances (Rule 2711 (f) and (h)) Negligent Misconduct Responsible Individual— Consider suspending responsible individual(s) in any or all capacities for up to 60 business days. Intentional/Reckless Misconduct Responsible Individual— Suspend responsible individual(s) in any or all capacities for a period of 60 business days to two years. In egregious cases, suspend individual(s) for a longer period or bar individual(s). Firm— Consider suspending firm's research activities for a period of one month to two years. Consider requiring firm to retain an independent consultant to review and make recommendations regarding the adequacy of the firm's supervisory procedures regarding research activities. Consider requiring firm, for a period of six months to two years, to certify monthly that a general securities principal has conducted a pre-distribution review of all research reports. In egregious cases, suspend firm in any or all activities or functions for up to two years or expel the firm. |
1. For violations of Rule 2711(i) Supervisory Procedures, Adjudicators should refer to the guideline for Supervision—Failure to Supervise.
2. As set forth in General Principle No. 6, Adjudicators may also order disgorgement.
Suitability—Unsuitable Recommendations
FINRA Rule 21111
| Principal Considerations in Determining Sanctions | Monetary Sanction | Suspension, Bar or Other Sanctions |
| See Principal Considerations in Introductory Section | Fine of $2,500 to $110,000.2 |
Suspend individual respondent in any or all capacities for a period of 10 business days to two years. Where aggravating factors predominate, strongly consider a bar for an individual respondent. Consider suspending a firm with respect to a limited set of activities for up to 90 days. In egregious cases, strongly consider suspending a firm for any or all activities for longer than 90 days or ordering expulsion. |
1. As set forth in General Principle No. 6, Adjudicators should also order disgorgement.
2. This guideline also is appropriate for violations of MSRB Rule G-19 and FINRA Rule 2114.
Telemarketing—Failing to Comply With Time-of-Day Restrictions and Do-Not-Call Lists; Failing to Establish and Maintain Procedures to Comply With Rule 2212(a)
NASD Rule 2212
| Principal Considerations in Determining Sanctions | Monetary Sanction | Suspension, Bar or Other Sanctions |
|
See Principal Considerations In Introductory Section. Failure to Comply with Time-of-Day Restrictions or Do-Not-Call Lists
1. Whether violations were widespread within the firm.
2. Number of calls that violated restrictions.
3. Whether there are patterns of abuses relating to when telephone calls are placed or to the repeated contacting of persons who have previously requested to be placed on a do-not-call list.
4. Whether firm made reasonable efforts to establish an effective call-blocking system for any members of the public requesting to be placed on a do-not-call list.
Failure to Establish and Maintain Procedures to Comply With Rule 2212(a)
1. Nature and extent of underlying misconduct that resulted from the deficient procedures, if any.
2. Whether firm made reasonable efforts to establish an effective call-blocking system for any members of the public requesting to be placed on a do-not-call list.
3. Whether there are patterns of abuses relating to when telephone calls are placed or to the repeated contacting of persons who have previously requested to be placed on a do-not-call list.
|
Failure to Comply with Time-of-Day Restrictions or Do-Not-Call Lists Fine of $5,000 to $37,000. Failure to Establish and Maintain Procedures to Comply with Rule 2212(a) Fine of $5,000 to $73,000. In egregious cases, consider a higher fine. |
Failure to Comply with Time-of-Day Restrictions or Do-Not-Call Lists Consider suspending responsible individual for up to 30 business days. In egregious cases, consider suspending the responsible individual in any or all capacities for up to two years. Also, consider suspending the firm with respect to any or all activities or functions, including telemarketing activities, for up to one year. Failure to Establish and Maintain Procedures to Comply with Rule 2212(a) Consider suspending responsible individual in any or all capacities for up to 30 business days. Consider limiting activities of appropriate branch office or department for up to 30 business days. In egregious cases, consider suspending the responsible individual for up to two years. In egregious cases, also consider limiting activities of appropriate branch office or department for more than 30 days or suspending the firm in any or all activities or functions, including telemarketing activities, for up to one year. |
Trading Ahead of Research Reports
| Principal Considerations in Determining Sanctions | Monetary Sanction | Suspension, Bar or Other Sanctions |
|
See Principal Considerations in Introductory Section
1. Whether the respondent member firm had developed "Chinese Wall" procedures to prevent the trading department from utilizing advance knowledge of the content and issuance of research reports in making trading decisions.
|
Fine of $5,000 to $146,000.1 |
Firm Consider suspending the firm with respect to any or all activities or functions and/or suspending the responsible individual for up to two years. In egregious cases, consider expelling the firm and/or barring the responsible individual. Individual Consider suspending the individual respondent in any or all capacities for up to two years. In egregious cases, consider barring the individual. |
1. As set forth in General Principle No. 6, Adjudicators may also order disgorgement.
Unauthorized Transactions and Failures to Execute Buy and/or Sell Orders
FINRA Rule 2010 and NASD IM-2310-21
| Principal Considerations in Determining Sanctions | Monetary Sanction | Suspension, Bar or Other Sanctions |
|
See Principal Considerations in Introductory Section
1. Whether respondent misunderstood his or her authority or the terms of the customer's orders.
2. Whether the unauthorized trading was egregious.2
|
Fine of $5,000 to $110,000.3 |
Suspend individual respondent in any or all capacities for a period of 10 business days to one year. In egregious cases,4 consider a longer suspension (of up to two years) or a bar of an individual respondent. Also consider suspending respondent member firm with respect to any or all activities or functions for up to two years. |
1. This guideline also is appropriate for violations of MSRB Rules G-17 and G-19.
2. The NAC has identified in its decisions the following categories of egregious unauthorized trading: 1) quantitatively egregious unauthorized trading, i.e., unauthorized trading that is egregious because of the sheer number of unauthorized trades executed; 2) unauthorized trading accompanied by aggravating factors, such as, efforts to conceal the unauthorized trading, attempts to evade regulatory investigative efforts, customer loss, or a history of similar misconduct (this list is illustrative, not exhaustive); and 3) qualitatively egregious unauthorized trading. Two factors are relevant to a determination as to whether unauthorized trading is qualitatively egregious: 1) the strength of the evidence, and 2) the respondent's motives; i.e., whether the respondent acted in bad faith or as a result of a reasonable misunderstanding. See, e.g., In re Daniel S. Hellen, Complaint No. C3A970031 (NAC June 15, 1999).
3. As set forth in General Principle No. 6, Adjudicators should also order disgorgement.
4.See note 2.