NASD Regulation Announces New Discovery Guide To Be Used In Arbitration Proceedings
INFORMATIONAL
Arbitration
SUGGESTED ROUTING |
KEY TOPICS |
Legal & Compliance Registered Representatives Senior Management Training |
Arbitration Discovery Guide |
The Suggested Routing function is meant to aid the reader of this document. Each NASD member firm should consider the appropriate distribution in the context of its own organizational structure.
Executive Summary
On September 2, 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved the use of the Discovery Guide (see Exhibit I) in National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (NASD®) arbitration proceedings involving customer disputes with firms and associated persons. The Discovery Guide is now available to use in NASD arbitration proceedings.
The Discovery Guide, which includes Document Production Lists, provides guidance to parties on which documents they should exchange without arbitrator or staff intervention, and to arbitrators in determining which documents customers and member firms or associated persons are presumptively required to produce in customer arbitrations.
Questions/Further Information
Questions regarding this Notice to Members may be directed to Gary Tidwell, Director, Neutral Management, Office of Dispute Resolution, NASD Regulation, Inc. (NASD RegulationSM), at (212) 858- 4352; or Eric Moss, Assistant General Counsel, Office of General Counsel, NASD Regulation, at (202) 728-8982.
Discussion
The Discovery Guide will be used as a supplement or an addendum to the guidance regarding discovery provided in The Arbitrator's Manual, published by Securities Industry Conference on Arbitration (SICA), and particularly the provisions in the section entitled, "Prehearing Conference," on pages 11 through 16. The Arbitrator's Manual is compiled by members of SICA as a guide for arbitrators, and is designed to supplement and explain the Uniform Code of Arbitration as developed by SICA. The procedures and policies described in The Arbitrator's Manual are discretionary and may be changed by the arbitrators. Further, nothing in the Discovery Guide, including the Document Production Lists, precludes the parties from voluntarily agreeing to an exchange of documents in a manner different from that set forth in the Discovery Guide.
The Discovery Guide consists of introductory and instructional text, and 14 Document Production Lists. It is intended for use by arbitrators in customer arbitrations only. These lists include the following (parenthetical references refer to the party from whom documents are sought):
List 1:
Documents To Be Produced In All Customer Cases (Firm/Associated Person(s))List 2:
Documents To Be Produced In All Customer Cases (Customer)List 3:
Churning (Firm/Associated Person(s))List 4:
Churning (Customer)List 5:
Failure To Supervise (Firm/Associated Person(s))List 6:
Failure To Supervise (Customer)List 7:
Misrepresentation/Omissions (Firm/Associated Person(s))List 8:
Misrepresentation/Omissions (Customer)List 9:
Negligence/Breach Of Fiduciary Duty (Firm/Associated Person(s))List 10:
Negligence/Breach Of Fiduciary Duty (Customer)List 11:
Unauthorized Trading (Firm/Associated Person(s))List 12:
Unauthorized Trading (Customer)List 13:
Unsuitability (Firm/Associated Person(s))List 14:
Unsuitability (Customer)
The Office of Dispute Resolution (ODR) will provide the parties with the Discovery Guide including the Document Production Lists at the time ODR serves the statement of claim. The document production requirements in the first two Document Production Lists, "List 1, Documents To Be Produced In All Customer Cases: Firm/Associated Person(s)," and "List 2, Documents To Be Produced In All Customer Cases: Customer," would apply in virtually all cases involving member-customer or associated person-customer disputes, unless the arbitrator, in the exercise of discretion, determines that some or all of the documents in the relevant Document Production Lists should not be produced. For cases in which allegations of churning, failure to supervise, misrepresentation/omissions, negligence/breach of fiduciary duty, unauthorized trading, or unsuitability are stated, additional Document Production Lists (e.g., Document Production Lists 3 and 4 - Churning) provide additional guidance. If a Document Production List is applicable, the Discovery Guide is drafted to guide the arbitrator to order production, unless in the exercise of discretion, the arbitrator believes that there is good cause not to order production.
Exhibit I
For NASD arbitrations, the Discovery Guide supplements the section in the Securities Industry Conference on Arbitration ("SICA") publication entitled The Arbitrator's Manual, and captioned "Prehearing Conference," found on pages 11 through 16, regarding public customer cases.
Discovery disputes have become more numerous and time consuming. The same discovery issues repeatedly arise. To minimize discovery disruptions, the NASD Regulation Office of Dispute Resolution has developed two initiatives to standardize the discovery process: early appointment of arbitrators to conduct an initial prehearing conference and document production lists (Document Production Lists).
No requirement under the Discovery Guide supersedes any record retention requirement of any federal or state law or regulation or any rule of a self-regulatory organization.
The Discovery Guide and Document Production Lists are designed for customer disputes with firms and Associated Person(s).1 The Discovery Guide also discusses additional discovery requests, information requests, depositions, admissibility of evidence, and sanctions. The Discovery Guide, including the Document Production Lists, will function as a guide for the parties and the arbitrators; it is not intended to remove flexibility from arbitrators or parties in a given case. For instance, arbitrators can order the production of documents not provided for by the Document Production Lists or alter the production schedule described in the Discovery Guide. Further, nothing in the Discovery Guide precludes the parties from voluntarily agreeing to an exchange of documents in a manner different from that set forth in the Discovery Guide. In fact, the Office of Dispute Resolution encourages the parties to agree to the voluntary exchange of documents and information and to stipulate to various matters. The fact that an item appears on a Document Production List does not shift the burden of establishing or defending any aspect of a claim.
The Office of Dispute Resolution will provide the parties with Document Production Lists (attached to the Discovery Guide) at the time it serves the statement of claim in customer cases. The arbitrators and the parties should consider the documents described in Document Production Lists 1 and 2 presumptively discoverable. Absent a written objection, documents on Document Production Lists 1 and 2 shall be exchanged by the parties within the time frames set forth below.
The arbitrators and parties also should consider the additional documents identified in Document Production Lists 3 through 14, respectively, discoverable, as indicated, for cases alleging the following causes of action: churning, failure to supervise, misrepresentation/omission, negligence/breach of fiduciary duty, unauthorized trading, and unsuitability. For the general document production and for each of these causes of action, there are separate Document Production Lists for firms/Associated Person(s) and for customers.
NASD Rule 10321 provides that the parties shall cooperate to the fullest extent practicable in the voluntary exchange of documents and information to expedite the arbitration process. As noted, nothing in the Discovery Guide precludes parties from voluntarily agreeing to an exchange of documents in a manner different from that set forth in the Discovery Guide.
The parties should produce all required documents listed in the applicable Document Production Lists not later than thirty days2 from the date the answer is due or filed, whichever is earlier. If a party redacts any portion of a document prior to production, the redacted pages (or ranges of pages) shall be labeled "redacted." A party may object to the production of any document, which would include an objection based upon an established privilege such as the attorney-client privilege. If any party objects to the production of any document listed in the relevant Document Production Lists, the party must file written objections with the Office of Dispute Resolution and serve all parties not later than thirty days following the date the answer is due or filed, whichever is earlier. Objections should set forth the reasons the party objects to producing the documents. An objection to the production of a document or a category of documents is not an acceptable reason to delay the production of any document not covered by the objection. A response to an objection should be served on all parties within 10 days from service of the written objections. Objections and responses should be filed with the Office of Dispute Resolution at the time they are served on the parties. The arbitrator(s) shall then determine whether the objecting party has overcome the presumption based upon sufficient reason(s).
If a party objects to document production on grounds of privacy or confidentiality, the arbitrator(s) or one of the parties may suggest a stipulation between the parties that the document(s) in question will not be disclosed or used in any manner outside of the arbitration of the particular case, or the arbitrator(s) may issue a confidentiality order. The arbitrator(s) shall not issue an order or use a confidentiality agreement to require parties to produce documents otherwise subject to an established privilege. Objections to the production of documents, based on an established privilege, should be raised in accordance with the time frame for objections set forth above.
If a party responds that no responsive information or documents exist, the customer or the appropriate person in the brokerage firm who has personal knowledge (i.e., the person who has conducted a physical search), upon the request of the requesting party, must: 1) state in writing that he/she conducted a good faith search for the requested information or documents; 2) describe the extent of the search; and 3) state that, based on the search, no such information or documents exist.
To maximize the efficient administration of a case by the arbitration panel,4 the Office of Dispute Resolution staff will schedule an initial prehearing conference in which the arbitrator(s) usually participates.5 The initial prehearing conference gives the arbitrator(s) and the parties an opportunity to organize the management of the case, set a discovery cut-off date,6 identify dispositive or other potential motions, schedule hearing dates, determine whether mediation is desirable, and resolve any other preliminary issues.7 During the initial prehearing conference, the arbitrator(s) and the parties should schedule hearing dates for the earliest available time, consistent with the parties' need to prepare adequately for the hearing.
Prior to the initial prehearing conference, each arbitrator should become familiar with the claims and defenses asserted in the pleadings filed by the parties. At the initial prehearing conference, the arbitrator(s) should order time limits for discovery that will allow the scheduling of hearing dates within a reasonable time and address all outstanding discovery disputes. If the exchange of properly requested documents has not occurred, the arbitrator(s) should order the production of all required documents, including those outlined in the Document Production Lists (see Section II. above), within 30 days following the conference.
The parties may request documents in addition to those identified in the Document Production Lists pursuant to Rule 10321(b). Unless a longer period is allowed by the requesting party, requests should be satisfied or objected to within 30 days from the date of service of the document request. A response to an objection should be served on all parties within 10 days from service of the written objections. Requests, objections, and responses should be filed with the Office of Dispute Resolution at the time they are served on the parties.
A party may move to compel production of documents when the adverse party (a) refuses to produce such documents or (b) offers only to produce alternative documents that are unacceptable to the requesting party. The Office of Dispute Resolution will provide the chairperson of the panel with the motion, opposition, and reply, along with the underlying discovery documents the parties have attached to their pleadings. The chairperson should determine whether to decide the matter on the papers or to convene a prehearing conference (usually via telephone). In considering motions to compel, particularly where non-production is based upon an argument asserting an established privilege, such as the attorney-client privilege, the arbitrator(s) should always give consideration to the arguments set forth by both sides, particularly as to the relevancy of the documents or information. The arbitrator(s) should carefully consider such motions, regardless of whether the item requested is on any of the Document Production Lists. If in doubt, the arbitrator(s) should ask the requesting party what specific documents it is trying to obtain and what it seeks to prove with the documents.
Like requests for documents, parties may serve requests for information pursuant to Rule 10321(b). Requests for information are generally limited to identification of individuals, entities, and time periods related to the dispute; such requests should be reasonable in number and not require exhaustive answers or fact finding. Standard interrogatories, as utilized in state and federal courts, are generally not permitted in arbitration.
Unless a longer period is allowed by the requesting party, information requests should be satisfied or objected to within 30 days from the date of service of the requests. A response to an objection should be served on all parties within 10 days from service of the written objections. Requests, objections, and responses should be filed with the Office of Dispute Resolution at the time they are served on the parties.
A party may move to compel responses to requests for information that the adverse party refuses to provide. The Office of Dispute Resolution will provide the chairperson of the panel with the motion, opposition, and reply, along with the underlying discovery documents the parties have attached to their pleadings. The chairperson should determine whether to decide the matter on the papers or to convene a prehearing conference (usually via telephone).
Depositions are strongly discouraged in arbitration. Upon request of a party, the arbitrator(s) may permit depositions, but only under very limited circumstances, such as: 1) to preserve the testimony of ill or dying witnesses; 2) to accommodate essential witnesses who are unable or unwilling to travel long distances for a hearing and may not otherwise be required to participate in the hearing; 3) to expedite large or complex cases; and 4) to address unusual situations where the arbitrator(s) determines that circumstances warrant departure from the general rule. Balanced against the authority of the arbitrator(s) to permit depositions, however, is the traditional reservation about the overuse of depositions in arbitration.
Production of documents in discovery does NOT create a presumption that the documents are admissible at the hearing. A party may state objections to the introduction of any document as evidence at the hearing to the same extent that any other objection may be raised in arbitration.
The arbitration panel should issue sanctions if any party fails to produce documents or information required by a written order, unless the panel8 finds that there is "substantial justification" for the failure to produce the documents or information. The panel has wide discretion to address noncompliance with discovery orders. For example, the panel may make an adverse inference against a party or assess adjournment fees, forum fees, costs and expenses, and/or attorneys' fees caused by noncompliance. In extraordinary cases, the panel may initiate a disciplinary referral against a registered entity or person who is a party or witness in the proceeding or may, pursuant to Rule 10305(b), dismiss a claim, defense, or proceeding with prejudice as a sanction for intentional failure to comply with an order of the arbitrator(s) if lesser sanctions have proven ineffective.
LIST 1
DOCUMENTS TO BE PRODUCED IN ALL CUSTOMER CASES9
FIRM/ASSOCIATED PERSON(S)
LIST 2
DOCUMENTS TO BE PRODUCED IN ALL CUSTOMER CASES
CUSTOMER
LIST 3
CHURNING
FIRM/ASSOCIATED PERSON(S)
LIST 4
CHURNING
CUSTOMER
No additional documents identified.
LIST 5
FAILURE TO SUPERVISE
FIRM/ASSOCIATED PERSON(S)
LIST 6
FAILURE TO SUPERVISE
CUSTOMER
No additional documents identified.
LIST 7
ISREPRESENTATION/OMISSIONS
FIRM/ASSOCIATED PERSON(S)
Copies of all materials prepared or used by the firm/Associated Person(s) relating to the transactions or products at issue, including research reports, prospectuses, and other offering documents, including documents intended or identified as being "for internal use only," and worksheets or notes indicating the Associated Person(s) reviewed or read such documents. As an alternative, the firm/Associated Person(s) may produce a list of such documents that contains sufficient detail for the claimant to identify each document listed. Upon further request by a party, the firm/Associated Person(s) must provide any documents identified on the list.
LIST 8
MISREPRESENTATION/OMISSIONS
CUSTOMER
LIST 9
NEGLIGENCE/BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY
FIRM/ASSOCIATED PERSON(S)
Copies of all materials prepared or used by the firm/Associated Person(s) relating to the transactions or products at issue, including research reports, prospectuses, and other offering documents, including documents intended or identified as being "for internal use only," and worksheets or notes indicating the Associated Person(s) reviewed or read such documents. As an alternative, the firm/Associated Person(s) may produce a list of such documents that contains sufficient detail for the claimant to identify each document listed. Upon further request by a party, the firm/Associated Person(s) must provide any documents identified on the list.
LIST 10
NEGLIGENCE/BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY
CUSTOMER
LIST 11
UNAUTHORIZED TRADING
FIRM/ASSOCIATED PERSON(S)
LIST 12
UNAUTHORIZED TRADING
CUSTOMER
LIST 13
UNSUITABILITY
FIRM/ASSOCIATED PERSON(S)
LIST 14
UNSUITABILITY
CUSTOMER
Endnotes
1 NASD Regulation may develop separate Document Production Lists for intra-industry disputes.
2 All time periods referenced herein are calendar days.
3 Section II.B. is also applicable to additional discovery requests and information requests (see Sections IV. and V.).
4 The panel consists of three arbitrators in most cases. Claims between $25,000 and $50,000 may proceed with a single arbitrator. Claims under $25,000 are decided by a single arbitrator, generally on the pleadings.
5 In some instances, the parties may opt out of the initial prehearing conference. To opt out, parties must supply the following information to the Office of Dispute Resolution by the specified deadline:
- a minimum of four sets of mutually agreeable hearing dates;
-
- a discovery cut-off date;
-
- a list of all anticipated motions with the motion due dates, opposition due dates, and reply due dates provided;
-
- a minimum of four dates and times for any proposed prehearing conferences to hear motions; and
-
- a determination whether briefs will be submitted and, if so, the due date for submission.
6 The Office of Dispute Resolution recommends that the panel set a cut-off date during the initial prehearing conference for service of discovery requests, giving due consideration to time frames that permit timely resolution of objections and disputes prior to the scheduled exchange of hearing exhibits pursuant to the NASD Code of Arbitration Procedure.
7 The arbitrators should direct one of the parties to prepare and forward to the Office of Dispute Resolution, within 48 hours, a written order memorializing the results of the prehearing conference, approved as to form and content by the other parties. When motions are heard at the initial prehearing conference, the panel may order the parties to submit the order with a stipulation as to form and content from all parties.
8 As with other rulings, an arbitration panel's ruling need only be by majority vote; it need not be unanimous.
9 Only named parties must produce documents pursuant to the guidelines set forth herein. However, non-parties may be required to produce documents pursuant to a subpoena or an arbitration panel order to direct the production of documents (see Rule 10322). In addition, the arbitration chairperson may use the Document Production Lists as guidance for discovery issues involving non-parties.