SEC Approves Amendment Clarifying The Application of the NASD's Corporate Financing Rule to Rule 415 Shelf Offerings and Certain Canadian Securities;
Effective Date: February 1, 1994
SUGGESTED ROUTING |
Senior Management |
Executive Summary
On November 10, 1993, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved an amendment to Subsection (b)(7)(C) to Article III, Section 44 of the Rules of Fair Practice clarifying that the exemptions from the filing requirements of the NASD's Corporate Financing Rule for securities registered on Forms S-3 or F-3 offered pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act) are limited to offerings that meet the eligibility criteria as set forth in these forms prior to October 21, 1992. In addition, the exemption for securities registered on Form F-10 under the Securities Act is amended to limit the exemption to Canadian issuers that meet the standards set forth in the SEC release approving that form and are offered pursuant to Canadian shelf-offering procedures. The text of the amendment, effective on February 1, 1994, follows the discussion below. In addition, attached is a copy of SEC registration statement Forms S-3 and F-3, prior to October 21, 1992, and Form F-10 as originally approved by the SEC.
Background
The Interpretation of the Board of Governors, Review of Corporate Financing (Corporate Financing Interpretation) was adopted in the early 1970s as an interpretation of the NASD basic ethical rule contained in Article III, Section 1 of the Rules of Fair Practice, which requires that "A member, in the conduct of his business, shall observe high standards of commercial honor and just and equitable principles of trade." The purpose of the Corporate Financing Interpretation was to determine whether the offering terms and arrangements of public offerings filed with the NASD for review were fair and reasonable in accordance with Article III, Section 1 of the Rules of Fair Practice. To that end, it required that the NASD issue an opinion as to the fairness and reasonableness of underwriting terms and arrangements.
Although not defined in the Corporate Financing Interpretation, the term "public offering" is defined in Schedule E to the NASD By-Laws1 to include any primary or secondary distribution of securities made pursuant to a registration statement or offering circular, except for offerings pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Exchange Act. Pursuant to the terms of the Corporate Financing Interpretation as of 1981, exemptions from the filing requirements of the Corporate Financing Interpretation were provided for certain specified classes of offerings that were regulated by other rules of the NASD, were under a specific scheme of regulation by other entities such as the SEC or the Treasury Department, or were subject to market forces that would assure the fairness and reasonableness of underwriting terms and arrangements of such offerings.
In 1982, the SEC adopted the Integrated Disclosure System, including new Form S-32. Form S-3, the SEC's short-form registration statement, permits the issuer to incorporate many of the required disclosure items by reference to the disclosure of the same items in filings under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. On March 8, 1983, the NASD simultaneously issued Notice to Members 83-12 (March 8, 1983) (1983 Notice to Members) and filed with the SEC Rule Filing SR-NASD-83-33 (1983 rule filing) for immediate effectiveness to clarify the availability of an exemption from the filing requirements of the Corporate Financing Interpretation for shelf offerings pursuant to new Rule 415.
The NASD stated in the 1983 Notice to Members and 1983 rule filing that exemptions to the Corporate Financing Interpretation filing requirements had previously been available where market forces or other constraints were present to assure the fairness and reasonableness of underwriting terms and arrangements, including specifically the amount of underwriting compensation. The 1983 Notice to Members and 1983 rule filing further stated that market pressures in Rule 415 transactions registered on Form S-3 often result in the amount of underwriting compensation being determined through a competitive bidding process that helps to achieve its reasonableness. Finally, the NASD stated it had concluded that even in transactions that eventually include a traditional underwriting agreement, competitive pressures come into play in the negotiations preceding the execution of the agreement that can be relied on to achieve the overall fairness of the agreements. An important clarification was provided in the 1983 Notice to Members and 1983 rule filing that offerings subject to the exemption were only exempt from the filing requirements of the Corporate Financing Interpretation and remained subject to the substantive requirements of the Interpretation.4
Subsequently, in 1988, the NASD issued Notice to Members 88-101 (December 1988) in response to inquiries of members and their counsel for clarification regarding the Corporate Financing Department's review procedures for Rule 415 offerings. That Notice includes the following statement regarding the view of the Corporate Financing Committee as to the continuing rationale for the availability of the exemption for offerings registered on Form S-3 and offered pursuant to Rule 415:
In connection with Rule 415 offerings, the Committee determined to exempt from the filing requirements securities registered on Form S-3 because an issue able to satisfy Form S-3's "registrant requirements" would be followed closely by investors and market professionals. The Committee also felt that the securities markets would efficiently determine a fair price for the securities being offered and that any underwriting compensation received by members ordinarily would be determined under very competitive circumstances (generally limited to normal brokerage transactions). The Committee did not believe that the same facts were present in Rule 415 offerings where the securities are registered on any form other than S-3.
In 1991, the NASD filed rule filing SR-NASD-91-19 with the SEC, which included a proposed codification of the Corporate Financing Interpretation as the new Corporate Financing Rule.5 The Rule 415/S-3 exemption was included in the new Rule at Subsection (b)(7)(C) and specified that the exemption was also available for shelf offerings on Form F-3 consistent with the Corporate Financing Committee's earlier interpretation.
Subsequently, the SEC adopted the Multi-Jurisdiction Disclosure and Modifications to the Current Registration and Reporting System for Canadian Issuers (MJDS) which adopted new forms for offerings in the U.S. by Canadian issuers6, and the NASD adopted an exemption for offerings filed on new Form F-10 by Canadian private and crown corporations and offered pursuant to Canadian shelf-offering rules.7
On October 21, 1992, the SEC approved an amendment to expand the availability of Form S-3 and to make Rule 415 registrations available to additional issuers as part of an effort to reduce the cost of financing through the securities markets.8 The SEC's amendment to Form S-3 has reduced the reporting history requirement of Form S-3 from 36 to 12 months for most issuers, reduced the public float test from $150 million to $75 million, and eliminated the three-million-share volume requirement. Finally, no reporting history is required to rely on Form S-3 to register investment grade asset-backed securities. At the same time, the SEC amendments permitted the registration of a single shelf-registration statement covering debt, equity, and other classes of securities without a specific allocation of offering amounts among the classes of securities being registered.
Description of the Amendment
The NASD reviewed the SEC's amendments to Form S-3 in keeping with its prior history of considering amendments to the NASD's Corporate Financing Filing Requirements to coordinate with the SEC's amendments to its registration forms and rules. The NASD is obligated to ensure the fairness of underwriting terms and arrangements as a self-regulatory organization registered under Section 15A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The NASD determined that investment grade non-convertible debt and investment grade non-convertible securities registered on amended Form S-3 should continue to be exempt from the Corporate Financing Rule Filing Requirements, regardless of the registration form relied on, under a separate exemption set forth in Section (b)(7)(B) of the Corporate Financing Rule.
The NASD, however, concluded it did not have sufficient information for the issuers that became eligible to file on Form S-3 to reach a determination that the Rule 415/S-3 exemption should be extended to the newly qualified issuers. Therefore, the NASD determined not to change its Filing Requirements at this time to provide an exemption for offerings by companies that meet the new requirements of Form S-3. The NASD will, however, undertake a one-year review of offerings filed with the NASD on registration statement Form S-3 and are offered pursuant to Rule 415 by companies that would not meet the prior criteria for Form S-3 to determine whether the market forces related to such offerings result in the presence of fair and reasonable underwriting terms and arrangements.
Accordingly, to clarify the Filing Requirements of the Corporate Financing Rule for issuers that now qualify to register on amended Form S-3, Section (b)(7)(C) of the Corporate Financing Rule is amended to provide that the exemption is only available for offerings that comply with Form S-3 pursuant to the requirements for that Form prior to October 21, 1992, which is the date of SEC approval of the amendments to Form S-3 expanding the availability of Form S-3 and making Rule 415 registrations available to additional issuers. The NASD believes the proposed rule change continues to ensure that compliance with the NASD's Corporate Financing Rule is effectively monitored.
Section (b)(7)(C) of the Corporate Financing Rule is also amended so that the exemption provided for shelf offerings on Form F-3 has been modified to reference the requirements for that Form prior to October 21, 1992, and the exemption for Form F-10 has been modified to reference the SEC release approving the MJDS. Although the SEC did not adopt amendments to these forms at the time it amended Form S-3, the NASD believes it should clarify all of these exemptions in the event amendments are adopted by the SEC in the future.
Policy for the Review of Shelf-Registration Statements
In determining not to expand the exemption from the Corporate Financing Rule at this time, the NASD recognizes its responsibility to ensure that application of the Rule does not impose a substantial burden on issuers. In this connection, it is important to note that the Corporate Financing Department has procedures to facilitate the expeditious review of shelf offerings. The NASD believes that publication of these procedures, as set forth below, will assist issuers, members, and their counsel to avail themselves of procedures that will expedite review of an offering pursuant to Rule 415 that is registered on SEC Form S-3 and avoid additional reviews of arrangements entered into in connection with separate offerings off the shelf.
The procedures approved by the Corporate Financing Committee are as follows:
Interpretation
In the SEC release9 publishing the amendment for comment, the NASD stated in footnote 5 to the release that the Form S-3 and Form F-3 exemptions from the Corporate Financing Rule filing requirements cannot be used for offerings if the Rule 415 box is checked on the cover page of the registration statement but the securities are distributed in a single traditional underwriting arrangement shortly after effectiveness. The NASD position set forth in footnote 5 reflects the NASD's original intent to limit the Corporate Financing Rule filing exemption to "delayed basis" shelf offerings. The NASD recognizes that the circumstances under which registrants may claim reliance on Rule 415 was changed by the SEC's adoption of Rule 430A in 198710 —well after the NASD's 1983 adoption of the S-3/Rule 415 exemption. Rule 430A provided a registrant the flexibility to offer its securities during a five-day post-effective period without filing an amendment to the registration statement. If the registrant was uncertain at the time of filing whether or not the securities would be offered promptly after effectiveness or on a delayed basis under Rule 415, the SEC permitted the registrant to follow an administrative procedure to retain the option to proceed under either Rule 430A or Rule 415 for all or a portion of the registered securities.11
Registrants also may claim reliance on Rule 415 in the case where the registrant includes on a single registration statement securities to be offered shortly after effectiveness in a conventional underwritten offering and other securities (such as common stock underlying warrants and securities of selling shareholders) to be offered on a delayed basis in the future. In this case, the registrant would include undertakings in compliance with Rule 415 for the delayed offerings, but not for the conventional underwriting.
As a result of the ability of registrants to rely on Rule 430A and Rule 415 simultaneously and to register a conventional and delayed offering on the same registration statement, it has been argued that the act of "checking the Rule 415 box" on the cover page of the registration statement is sufficient for a member to rely on the S-3/Rule 415 exemption to the Filing Requirements of the Corporate Financing Rule. The Filing Requirements of the Corporate Financing Rule requires that all public offerings of securities be filed with the NASD for review if a member participates in the offering, unless an exemption from filing is available. The NASD believes that a claimed exemption from the Filing Requirements of the Corporate Financing Rule cannot be "potentially" or "possibly" available, or available under some circumstances and not others, or—in the case of a shelf registration— only available for a portion of the securities registered. It is, therefore, inappropriate for a member to rely on any of the available exemptions from the Filing Requirements of the Corporate Financing Rule if, at the time between the date when filing with the Corporate Financing Department would be required and the effective date of the offering, the member does not reasonably believe that the offering, including each tranche of securities off of a shelf registration, qualifies for an exemption. The member is required to review the facts and circumstances of the offering and must reasonably believe that the proposed manner of distribution satisfies an exemption from the Filing Requirements of the Corporate Financing Rule to rely on that exemption.
In particular, the NASD believes that "checking the Rule 415 box" on the cover page of a Form S-3 registration statement is not dispositive of the availability of the S-3/Rule 415 exemption under the Corporate Financing Rule as the Rule 415 election may relate solely to the future issuance of common stock underlying warrants or of common stock registered for selling shareholders and not to the registration on the same registration statement of securities of the issuer that are to be sold in a conventional underwriting shortly after effectiveness of the registration statement.
Moreover, if a registrant relies on both Rule 430A and Rule 415 for an offering registered on Form S-3, the NASD believes that the offering is required to be filed for review under the Filing Requirements of the Corporate Financing Rule, as the simultaneous reliance on Rule 430A indicates that it is possible the securities may be sold in the form of a traditional underwriting syndicate within a few days following the effective date of the offering.12
* * * * *
To assist members in determining whether an exemption from the Filing Requirements is available under Subsections (b)(7)(C)(i) and (ii) to Article III, Section 44 of the NASD Rules of Fair Practice, the NASD is attaching to this Notice a copy of Forms S-3 and F-3 as those forms existed before October 21, 1992, and a copy of Form F-10 as approved by the SEC on June 21, 1991.
The amendments take effect February 1, 1994. Questions regarding this Notice may be directed to the Corporate Financing Department of the NASD at (202) 728-8258.
1 The Corporate Financing Interpretation provided that definitions in the By-Laws or the Rules of Fair Practice have the meaning defined therein for purposes of the Interpretation unless the context requires otherwise. The discussion herein is based on the definition as of 1981.
2 The financial criteria for Form S-3 was modified from that in Form S-16, with the other requirements for reporting history and default on debt remaining the same.
To use Form S-3, the issuer was required to have at least $150 million aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates or, alternatively, $100 million aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates and an annual trading volume of at least three million shares, except in the case of an offering of investment grade debt (i.e., debt rated in one of the four highest generic rating categories by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization).
3 Securities Exchange Act Rel. No. 19648 (April 4, 1983); 48 F.R. 15358 (April 8, 1983).
4 In 1984, in response to a request by the staff of the SEC for an interpretation of the filing requirements under the Corporate Financing Interpretation for foreign private issuers, the NASD determined to treat offerings on Form F-3 the same as offerings on Form S-3 by providing an exemption to the filing requirements if the offering is made pursuant to Rule 415 on the basis that the scheme of regulation on Form F-3 paralleled that for a company registering on Form S-3.
5 The Corporate Financing Rule was adopted as Article III, Section 44 to the NASD Rules of Fair Practice on April 15, 1992, at which time the Corporate Financing Interpretation was rescinded. Securities Exchange Act Rel. No. 30587 (April 15, 1992); 57 FR 14597 (April 21, 1992).
6 Securities Act Release No. 6902 (June 21, 1991).
7 Form F-10 may be used by Canadian issuers with outstanding equity with an aggregate market value of at least (CN) $360 million and a public float of at least (CN) $75 million, where the issuer has a reporting history with Canadian authorities of at least 36 months.
8 Securities Act Rel. No. 6964 (October 22, 1992), 57 FR 48970 (October 29, 1992).
9 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 32316 (May 17, 1993); 58 F.R. 29672.
10 Rule 430A permits the filing of a final prospectus that omits certain pricing and underwriting compensation information and interest payments and maturity dates so long as a prospectus with the final information is filed with the SEC within five days following the effective date of the offering.
11 Securities Act Release No. 6964 (October 22, 1992), footnote 30 citing Securities Act Release No. 6714 (May 27, 1987). The SEC further expanded the ability of a registrant to rely on Rule 430A when it amended Form S-3 in 1992, by amending Form 430A to permit price changes and volume decreases that do not materially change the disclosure in the registration statement to be reflected in the final prospectus without the need to file a post-effective amendment. Previously, even immaterial decreases in the volume of securities offered and a pricing change outside of a bona fide range would have required the filing of a post-effective amendment. Securities Act Release No. 6964 (October 22, 1992).
12 In its release adopting the amendments to Form S-3, the SEC was asked regarding a practice that had developed in response to concerns about immediate underwritten sales of a large (or the entire) amount of securities offered pursuant to a registration statement that disclosed that the securities would be offered from time to time in the market, and did not disclose the terms of the distribution immediately after effectiveness. The SEC reminded registrants that disclosure in the registration statement at the time of effectiveness should accurately reflect the registrant's current plans and arrangements for the distribution of securities and stated that compliance with the 48hour waiting period is not an appropriate basis for relying on Rule 415. Securities Act Release No. 6964 (October 22, 1992).
Text of Amendment to Article III, Section 44 of the Rules of Fair Practice
(Note: New language is underlined; deleted language is bracketed.)
THE CORPORATE FINANCING RULE
Underwriting Terms and Arrangements
Sec. 44.
* * * * *
* * * * *
FORM S-3 REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
This instruction sets forth registrant requirements and transaction requirements for the use of Form S-3. Any registrant which meets the requirements of paragraph A. below ("Registrant Requirements") may use this form for the registration of securities under the Securities Act of 1933 which are offered in any transaction specified in paragraph B. below ("Transaction Requirements"), provided that the requirements applicable to the specified transaction are met. With respect to majority-owned subsidiaries, see paragraph C. below.
Securities to be offered for cash by or on behalf of a registrant, or outstanding securities to be offered for cash for the account of any person other than the registrant, including securities acquired by standby underwriters in connection with the call or redemption by the registrant of warrants or a class of convertible securities; provided that the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant is $150 million or more, or alternatively, the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant is $100 million or more and the registrant has had an annual trading volume of such stock of three million shares or more.
Instruction. The aggregate market value of the registrant's outstanding voting stock shall be computed by use of the price at which the stock was last sold, or the average of the bid and asked prices of such stock as of a date within 60 days prior to the date of filing. Annual trading volume shall be the volume of shares traded in any continuous 12 month period ended within 60 days prior to the date of filing. See the definition of "affiliate" in Securities Act Rule 405.
Non-convertible debt and preferred securities to be offered for cash by or on behalf of a registrant, provided such securities are "investment grade securities," as defined below. A non-convertible debt or preferred security is an "investment grade security" if, at the time of effectiveness of the registration statement, at least one nationally recognized statistical rating organization (as that term is used in Rule 15c3-1 (c) (2) (vi) (F) under the Exchange Act) has rated the security in one of its generic rating categories which signifies investment grade; typically, the four highest rating categories (within which there may be sub-categories or gradations indicating relative standing) signify investment grade.
Outstanding securities to be offered for the account of any person other than the issuer, including securities acquired by standby underwriters in connection with the call or redemption by the issuer of warrants or a class of convertible securities, if securities of the same class are listed and registered on a national securities exchange or are quoted on the automated quotation system of a national securities association. In addition, attention is directed to General Instruction C to Form S-8 for the registration of employee benefit plan securities for resale.
Securities to be offered: (a) upon the exercise of outstanding rights granted by the issuer of the securities to be offered, if such rights are granted on a pro rata basis to all existing security holders of the class of securities to which the rights attach; or (b) pursuant to a dividend or interest reinvestment plan; or (c) upon the conversion of outstanding convertible securities or upon the exercise of outstanding transferable warrants issued by the issuer of the securities to be offered, or by an affiliate of such issuer; provided the issuer has sent to all record holders of such rights, or to all participants in such plans, or to all record holders of such convertible securities or transferable warrants, respectively, material containing the information required by Rule 14a-3(b) under the Exchange Act and Items 401, 402 and 403 of Regulation S-K within the 12 calendar months immediately preceding the filing of the registration statement, except that the information required by Items 401, 402 and 403 of Regulation S-K need only be provided to holders of rights exercisable for common stock, holders of securities convertible into common stock, participants in plans which may invest in common stock, or in securities convertible into common stock or warrants exercisable for common stock, respectively.
Note. In such an instance, the parent-guarantor is the issuer of a separate security consisting of the guarantee which must be concurrently registered but may be registered on the same registration statement as are the guaranteed securities.
FORM F-3 REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
This instruction sets forth registrant requirements and transaction requirements for the use of Form F-3. Any foreign private issuer, as defined in Rule 405 which meets the requirements of I.A. below ("Registrant Requirements") may use this Form for the registration of securities under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act") which are offered in any transaction specified in I.B. below ("Transaction Requirements"), provided that the requirements applicable to the specified transaction are met. With respect to majority-owned subsidiaries, see Instruction I.A.6 below.
Instruction. The aggregate market value of the registrant's outstanding voting stock shall be computed by use of the price at which the stock was last sold, or the average of the bid and asked prices of such stock, in the principal market for such stock as of a date within 60 days prior to the date of filing. [See the definition of "affiliate" in Securities Act, Rule 405.]
Securities to be offered for cash by or on behalf of a registrant; if the financial statements in the registrant's latest filing on Form 20-F comply with Item 18 thereof.
Non-convertible debt securities to be offered for cash if such debt securities are "investment grade debt securities," as defined below. A non-convertible debt security is an "investment grade debt security" if, at the time of effectiveness of the registration statement, at least one nationally recognized statistical rating, organization (as that term is used in Rule 15c3-1 (c) (2) (vi) (F) under the Exchange Act has rated the security in one of its generic rating categories that signifies investment grade; typically, the four highest rating categories (within which there may be subcategories or graduations indicating relative standing) signify investment grade.
Outstanding securities to be offered for the account of any person other than the issuer, including securities acquired by standby underwriters in connection with the call or redemption by the issuer of warrants or a class of convertible securities. In addition, Form F-3 may be used by affiliates to register securities for resale pursuant to the conditions specified in General Instruction C to Form S-8 if the financial statements in the registrant's latest filing on Form 20-F comply with Item 18 thereof.
Securities to be offered: (a) upon the exercise of outstanding rights granted by the issuer of the securities to be offered, if such rights are granted pro rata to all existing security holders of the class of securities to which the rights attach; or (b) pursuant to a dividend or interest reinvestment plan; or (c) upon the conversion of outstanding convertible securities or upon the exercise of outstanding transferable warrants issued by the issuer of the securities to be offered, or by an affiliate of such issuer. The registration of securities to be offered or sold in a standby underwriting in the United States or similar arrangement is not permitted pursuant to this paragraph. See paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) above.
FORM F-10
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
Instruction. For purposes of this form, an "affiliate" of a person is anyone who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, or exercises control or direction over, more than 10 percent of the outstanding equity shares of such person. The determination of a person's affiliates shall be made as of the end of such person's most recently completed fiscal year.
Instructions.
Instructions.