SEC Rule Change Relating to Foreign Securities in NASDAQ
TO: All NASD Members and NASDAQ Subscribers
On October 5, 1983, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted a rule change which will require all foreign issuers seeking inclusion in NASDAQ to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This registration requires foreign issuers to file periodic reports with the Commission similar to those filed by domestic companies. The Commission action also provides that the 102 non-Canadian foreign securities included in NASDAQ as of October 5, 1983 are "grandfathered" and will be permitted to remain on NASDAQ indefinitely provided they satisfy all other requirements for continued inclusion. With respect to the 186 Canadian issues, they will be permitted to remain on NASDAQ, provided they continue to satisfy all other requirements, until January 2, 1986, at which time they must be registered pursuant to Section l2(g) in order to remain in the System. A copy of the Commission's order as well as lists of non-Canadian foreign securities and Canadian securities on NASDAQ as of October 5, 1983 are attached to this Notice.
This rule change will also prohibit the reinclusion of foreign securities which are removed from NASDAQ unless they subsequently become 12(g) registered. Accordingly, the failure by a foreign issuer to comply with any NASDAQ requirement would result in the removal of its securities from the NASDAQ System until it meets the SEC requirement for 12(g) registration.
Questions regarding this Notice may be directed to Gary W. Guinn, Assistant Director, NASDAQ Operations at (202) 728-8052.
Sincerely,
Molly G. Bayley
Vice President
NASDAQ Operations
Enclosure
NON-CANADIAN FOREIGN SECURITIES IN NASDAQ SYSTEM AS OF OCTOBER 5, 1983
SYMBOL |
COMPANY NAME |
ASMIF |
Advanced Semiconductor Materials International N.V. |
ANECF |
Aneco Reinsurance Co. |
AAGIY |
Anglo American Gold - ADR |
ANGLY |
Anglo American Corporation of South Africa Limited - ADR |
ASEAY |
Asea AB - ADR |
BKLMY |
Bank Leumi Le-Israel B.M. - ADR |
BBAHF |
Basic Resources International (Bahamas) Limited |
BHAMY |
Beecham Group - ADR |
BLYVY |
Blyvooruitzicht Gold Mining Company, Limited - ADR |
BWTRY |
Bowater Corp. PLC - ADR |
BRILF |
Brilund Limited |
BRKNY |
Broken Hill Propietary Company Limited - ADR |
BFELY |
Buffelsfontein Gold Mining Limited - ADR |
BURMY |
Burmah Oil PLC - ADR |
CANNY |
Canon Inc. - ADR |
CIRCF |
Cayman Islands Reinsurance Corporation Ltd. |
CIRCZ |
Cayman Islands Reinsurance Corporation Ltd.- Units |
CPMNY |
Central Pacific Minerals - ADR |
CSTIF |
Coastal International Ltd. |
BPWRF |
Compania Boliviana De Energia Electrica, S.A. |
ELSAY |
Compania De Alumbrado Electricode San Salvador S.A. - ADR |
CSKKY |
Computer Services Corp. - ADR |
DAIEY |
Dai Ei Inc. - ADR |
DBRSY |
DeBeers Consolidated - ADR |
DRSDY |
Dresdner Bank A.G. - ADR |
DRFNY |
Driefontein Consolidated - ADR |
EGCLY |
Eagle Corp. - ADR |
ELBTF |
Elbit Computers, Ltd. |
ECILF |
Electronic Corp. of Israel |
ELRNF |
Elron Electronic Industries, Inc. |
ELSTF |
Elscint Ltd. |
ESHLY |
Energy Systems Holding - ADR |
FERVY |
Ferrovanadium Corp. - ADR |
FISNY |
Fisons Ltd. - ADR |
FLAEF |
Florida Employers Insurance Co. |
FREEY |
Free State Geduld Mines Ltd. - ADR |
FUJIY |
Fugi Photo Film - ADR |
GAMBY |
Gambro A.B. - ADR |
GLXOY |
Glaxo Holdings PLC - ADR |
GLDFY |
Gold Fields South Africa - ADR |
GOTLF |
Gotaas Larsen Shipping |
GOLDY |
Great Eastern Mines Ltd. - ADR |
HTENY |
Hartogen Energy - ADR |
HMSLF |
Hemerdon Mining and Smelting Ltd. |
HSVLY |
Highveld Steel and Vanadium Corporation Limited - ADR |
HITAZ |
Hitachi Ltd. - Debs. |
HRCLY |
Huntingdon Research Centre PLC-ADR |
IDBBY |
IDB Bankholding - ADR (Common) |
IDBBZ |
IDB Bankholding - ADR (Preferred) |
IEMSY |
IEM, S.A. - ADR |
IYCOY |
ITO Yokado Co. - ADR |
INMRY |
Instrumentarium Corp. - ADR |
ICEYF |
International Capital Equipment Limited |
IPLLF |
Interpharm Laboratories Limited |
JAPNY |
Japan Airlines - ADR |
KNBWY |
Kirin Brewery Co. - ADR |
KLOFY |
Kloof Gold Mining Co., Ltd. - ADR |
ERICY |
L.M. Ericsson Telephone Co. - ADR |
LYDPY |
Lydenburg Platinum Limited - ADR |
MKTAY |
Makita Electric Works, Ltd. - ADR |
MARTY |
Marubeni Corp. - ADR |
MEOLY |
Meridan Oil N.L. - ADR |
MNRCY |
Minerals and Resources - ADR |
MITSY |
Mitsui & Company - ADR |
NIPNY |
NEC Corp. - ADR |
NZPCY |
New Zealand Petroleum Co. - ADR |
NIMSY |
Nimslo International Ltd. - ADR |
NSANY |
Nissan Motors Co. - ADR |
NOBLF |
Nobel Insurance Ltd. |
NORKZ |
Norsk Data A.S. - ADR (Class B) |
OVRSF |
Overseas Inns S.A. |
PALAY |
Palabora Mining - ADR |
PELRY |
Pelsart Resources - ADR |
PHABY |
Pharmacia A.B. - ADR |
PGLOY |
N.V.Philips Gloeilampenfabrieke - ADR |
PRESY |
President Brand Gold Mining - ADR |
PSTYY |
President Steyn Gold Mining - ADR |
RANKY |
Rank Organization PLC - ADR |
RICOZ |
Ricoh Co. Ltd. Debentures |
RODMY |
Rodime PLC - ADR |
RPETY |
Royal Dutch Petroleum - ADR |
STOSY |
Santos Ltd. - ADR |
SANYY |
Sanyo Electric Co. - ADR |
SASOY |
Sasol Ltd. - ADR |
SCIXF |
Scitex Corporation Ltd. |
SHSDY |
Shiseido Co. Ltd. - ADR |
SPBGY |
Sotheby Parke Bernet - ADR |
SPPTY |
Southern Pacific Petroleum N.L. - ADR |
SGOLY |
St. Helena Gold Mines Limited - ADR |
SWANY |
Swan Resources - ADR |
TAROF |
Taro Vit Chemical Industries Limited |
TFONY |
Telefonos De Mexico S.A. - ADR |
TEVIY |
Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd. - ADR |
TKIOY |
Tokio Marine and Fire Insurance Company |
TOYOY |
Toyota Motor Corp. - ADR |
UFURF |
Universal Furniture Limited |
UMUKY |
Universal Money Centers, PLC - ADR |
VAALY |
Vaal Reefs Exploration and Mining Company Limited - ADR |
VELCF |
Velcro Industries N.V. |
WLKMY |
Welkom Gold Mining Company - ADR |
WDEPY |
Western Deep Levels - ADR |
WHLDY |
Western Holdings Limited - ADR |
CANADIAN SECURITIES IN NASDAQ SYSTEM AS OF OCTOBER 5, 1983
SYMBOL |
COMPANY NAME |
TWTHF |
20th Century Energy Corp. |
AMCIF |
AMCA Resources |
AEAGF |
Agnico Eagle Mines |
APLOF |
Alaska Apollo Gold |
AMAEF |
Amark Exploration |
ACEVF |
American Energy Corp. |
AMPYF |
American Pyramid Resources, Inc. |
AMORF |
Am ore Resources Inc. |
ANGBF |
Anglo-Bomarc Mines |
AQRLF |
Aquarius Resources Ltd. |
AVCMF |
Arivaca Silver Mines |
ARZNF |
Arizona Silver Corp. |
APCOF |
Artesian Petroleum |
ASSRF |
Associated Recreation Corporation |
AVMRF |
Avino Mines and Resources |
BPIRF |
BPI Resources Ltd. |
BKGDF |
Baker Gold Ltd. |
BCATF |
Bearcat Exploration |
BTYCF |
Beauty Counselors Intl. Inc. |
BELGF |
Belgium Standard Ltd. |
BEOVF |
Belmont Resources, Inc. |
BMRFC |
Belmoral Mines Ltd. (N.P.L.) |
BIOLF |
Bio Logicals, Inc. |
BGENF |
Biogen N.V. |
BIOXF |
Bionex Corporation |
BIXFU |
Bionex Corporation (Units) |
BIXFW |
Bionex Corporation (Warrants) |
BLUSF |
Blue Sky Oil & Gas Ltd. |
BWOGF |
Bluewater Oil and Gas Limited |
BRALF |
Bralorne Resources |
BRASF |
Bras D'or Mines Ltd. |
BWRLF |
Breakwater Resources, Ltd. |
BRIIF |
Brican Resources Ltd. |
CXPVF |
C.T. Exploranda Limited |
CYECF |
Cal Dynamics Energy |
CALSF |
California Silver Ltd. |
CAMRF |
Camreco Inc. |
CDXOF |
Canadex Resources |
CBRCF |
Canadian Barranca Corp. |
CRLNF |
Carolin Mines Ltd. |
CECRF |
Century Energy Corp. |
CIORF |
Charriot Resources |
CIGCF |
Citadel Gold Mines, Inc. |
CLBMF |
Colby Resources Corp. |
CNCPF |
Concept Resources Ltd. |
CCIMF |
Consolidated Cinola Mines |
CPFTF |
Consolidated Professor Mines |
CTLSF |
Continental Silver Corp. |
CLEXF |
Copper Lake Exploration |
CORRF |
Coralta Resources Ltd. |
COWPF |
Cornwall Petroleum & Resources |
CUMOF |
Cumo Resources Ltd. |
CUSIF |
Cusac Industries Ltd. |
DAMIF |
David Minerals Ltd. |
DENIF |
Denison Mines Ltd. |
DKNFA |
Dickenson Mines Ltd. - Class A |
DKNFB |
Dickenson Mines - Class B |
DONEF |
Donegal Resources Ltd. |
EGEXF |
Energex Minerals Ltd. |
EXAIF |
Exploration Aiguebelle, Inc. |
FMGTF |
FMG Telecomputer, Ltd. |
FALCF |
Falconbridge Ltd. |
RIALF |
Flair Resources Ltd. |
GANDF |
Gandalf Technologies |
GOEDF |
Geodome Petroleum Corp. |
GLGVF |
Glamis Gold Ltd. |
GIAKF |
Goldale Investment Ltd. |
GCCVF |
Golden Concord Mining Corp. |
GWNRF |
Goldwin Resources Ltd. |
HALEF |
Hale Resources, Ltd. |
GOWGF |
Gowganda Resources |
GLICF |
Grandma Lee's Inc. |
GRVXF |
Grove Exploration Ltd. |
HRIAF |
H.R.S. Industries - Class A |
HRIBF |
H.R.S. Industries - Class B |
HSDMF |
Hemisphere Dev. Corp. |
HCORF |
Hi-Cor Resources Ltd. |
HIWDF |
Highwood Resources Ltd. |
HIMVF |
Himac Resources Ltd. |
HOSTF |
Host Ventures Ltd. |
IMGFC |
Imaginamics Inc. |
IMUFC |
Imaginamics Inc. - Units |
INCRF |
Inca Resources |
INLWF |
Inco Limited - Warrants |
INRLF |
Interaction Resources Ltd. |
ICCCF |
Intercontinental Tech. Corp. |
ILDCF |
Interlake Develop. Corp. |
ICREF |
International Corona Resources |
IPTLF |
International Phasor Telecom Ltd. |
ISTRF |
International Standard Resources |
IWWDF |
International Westward Development Corp. |
IPIPF |
Interprovincial Pipe Line Ltd. |
ITERF |
Interstat Resources, Inc. |
IOAVF |
Iona Industries, Inc. |
IRWKF |
Irwin Toy Ltd. - Non Voting |
IRWJF |
Irwin Toy Ltd. - Voting |
KMADF |
Kamad Silver Co. Ltd. |
KFRLF |
Keeley-Frontier Resources, Ltd. |
KDDYF |
Kennedy Resources |
KNOBF |
Knobby Lake Mines |
LAORF |
La Teko Resources Ltd. |
LCNAF |
Lacana Mining Corp. |
LAVAF |
Lava Cap Resources |
LEADF |
Leader Resources Inc. |
LNCRF |
Lincoln Resources, Inc. |
LSEIF |
Lodestar Energy Inc. |
LDNSF |
London Silver Corporation |
LORDF |
Loredi Resources Ltd. |
MCLNF |
MacLean Hunter Ltd. |
MZRKF |
Mackenzie Energy Corp. |
MAMNF |
Madre Mining Ltd. |
MAYMF |
Maymac Explorations Ltd. |
MEGLF |
Megaline Resources Ltd. |
MOGOF |
Monogram Oil & Gas, Inc. |
MOSPF |
Mosport Park Corporation |
MGDVF |
Murgold Resources, Inc. |
MUSMF |
Muscocho Explorations Ltd. |
NRDFC |
NRD Mining Ltd. |
NFEXF |
New Frontier Petroleum Corp. |
NICLF |
Ni-Cal Developments Ltd. |
NQRLF |
Nor-Quest Resources Ltd. |
NAPPF |
North American Power Petroleums Inc. |
NTHMF |
Northair Mines Ltd. |
NWELF |
Nowsco Well Services Ltd. |
OBERF |
O'Brien Energy Resources |
OMNRF |
Omni Resources Inc. |
PCRIF |
P.C.R. Industries Ltd. |
PCYMF |
Pacific Cypress Minerals Ltd. |
PCEXF |
Pan Central Exploration |
PARAF |
Paragon Resources |
PAPEF |
Parkside Petroleum, Inc. |
PGULF |
Pegasus Gold Ltd. |
PENRF |
Pennant Resources |
PTPLF |
Petrologic Petroleum Ltd. |
PEZAF |
Pezamerica Res. Corp. |
PILCF |
Pilgrim Coal Corporation |
PLUSF |
Plexus Resources Corp. |
PRPEF |
Prairie Pacific Energy |
QSRTF |
Quebec Sturgeon River Mines |
RERIF |
Rainier Energy Resources |
RAYOF |
Raymac Oil Corp. |
RYRKF |
Rayrock Resources |
RDFDF |
Redford Resources |
RCINZ |
Rogers Cablesystems - Class B |
ROREF |
Rosmae Resources Ltd. |
RKLMF |
Ruskin Development Ltd. |
SAXIF |
Saxton Industries Ltd. |
SCRLF |
Sceptre Resources Ltd. |
SYDMF |
Scheer Energy Dev. Corp. |
SLPTF |
Scintilore Explorations Ltd. |
SCOTF |
Scottie Gold Mines |
SGULF |
Seagull Resources |
SHFXF |
Shadowfax Resources Ltd. |
SHYDF |
Sharon Energy Ltd. |
SOGLF |
Shelter Oil and Gas Ltd. |
SECGF |
Silver Eureka Corp. |
SLVRF |
Silverado Mines Ltd. |
STMAF |
Stampede International Resources |
SEXLF |
States Exploration Ltd. |
SSECF |
Stateside Energy Corp. |
STVTF |
Sterivet Laboratories, Ltd. |
SULBF |
Sulpetro Ltd. - Class B |
TLOVF |
Talos Industries Inc. |
TARAF |
Taurus Resources Ltd. |
TMEXF |
Terra Mines, Ltd. |
TGNXF |
Tournigan Mining Explorations Ltd. |
TRIBF |
Tri Basin Resources |
TTRIF |
Trident Resources, Inc. |
TRTTF |
Trinity Resources Ltd. |
TURBF |
Turbo Resources Ltd. |
UCANF |
United Canso Oil & Gas |
UHRNF |
United Hearne Resources |
UNWRF |
United Westland Resources |
VELXF |
Velvet Exploration Co., Ltd. |
VNTRF |
Ventora Resources Ltd. |
VEOXF |
Veronex Resources Ltd. |
VISRF |
Viscount Resources |
VIPLF |
Vulcan Industrial Packaging Ltd. |
WARRF |
Warrior Resources Ltd. |
WABEF |
Western Allenbee Oil & Gas Co. Ltd |
WSFPF |
Westfort Petroleums Ltd. |
WTMRF |
West mount Resources Ltd. |
WFRAF |
Wharf Resources Ltd. |
WDSRF |
Windsor Resources Inc. |
YBRIF |
Yellowknife Bear Resources, Inc. |
ZONEF |
Zone Petroleum Corp. |
federal register
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
17 CFR Parts 230 and 240
[Release Nos. 33-6493; 34-20264; File No. S7-951]
Foreign Securities
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission.
ACTION: Final rules.
SUMMARY: The Commission today announces the adoption of revisions to a current rule, known as the information-supplying exemption which exempts certain foreign securities from registration under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These revisions generally treat foreign securities quoted on the automated quotation system of the National Association of Securities Dealers ("NASDAQ") the same as foreign securities listed on a United States ("U.S.") exchange. Generally, non-Canadian foreign securities currently quoted on NASDAQ could continue to rely on the exemption indefinitely subject to certain conditions. Canadian securities,. however, currently quoted on NASDAQ could continue to rely on the exemption until January 2, 1986. Revisions also are made to other rules to clarify the concept of voluntary entry into the U.S. capital markets.
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 14, 1983.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl T. Bodolus (202) 272-3246, Office of International Corporate Finance, Division of Corporation Finance, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Foreign private issuers whose securities are not trading on one of the national securities exchanges are now exempt from registering with the Commission. The Commission today is revising that exemption so that it will no longer be available to foreign issuers whose securities trade on NASDAQ. This change is being made because the Commission believes that trading on NASDAQ is substantially the same a8 trading on an exchange and therefore the information available for NASDAQ traded companies should be essentially the same as the information available for exchange traded companies. The Commission will "grandfather" foreign private issuers who are now trading on NASDAQ and relying on the exemption. Canadian issuers will be grandfathered for two years and all other foreign issuers will be grandfathered indefinitely. However, no additional foreign equity securities can begin trading on NASDAQ unless they are registered with the Commission.
I. Background
The Commission is adopting revisions to Rule 12g3-2 (17 CFR 240.12g3-2) 1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") [15 U.S.C. 78a et seq. (1976 and Supp. Ill 1979)] that would terminate the availability of that exemptive rule to certain foreign issuers with securities quoted in NASDAQ and clarify several provisions of that rule.2 Amendments to Rule 12g-3 (17 CFR 240.12g-3) and Rule 15d-5 (17 CFR 240.15d-5) relating to successor issuers further clarify the application of the periodic reporting requirements of the Exchange Act to issuers that acquire reporting issuers by the issuance of securities. The concept of the "essentially U.S. issuer" exemption in the definition of foreign private issuer in Rule 405 (17 CFR 230.405) and Rule 3b-4 (17 CFR 240-3b-4) is also revised. Rule 12g-l (17 CFR 240-12g-l) is also clarified.
The Commission solicited public comments on these changes in Release No. 33-6433 (October 28, 1982) [47 FR 50292]. One hundred sixty-three comment letters were received on the proposals.3 One hundred twenty-six were from individuals, thirteen from issuers, eight from the securities industry, five from law firms, three each from associations and banks maintaining facilities for American Depositary Receipts, two each from analysts and self-regulatory organizations, and one from a foreign securities exchange. Most commentators addressed only the proposal that the information-supplying exemption in Rule 12g3-2(b) be no longer available for securities quoted in an automated inter-dealer quotation system, i.e., NASDAQ.
II. Registration for NASDAQ Listing
Proposed paragraph (d) (3) of Rule 12g3-2 would have denied the information-supplying exemption to securities quoted on NASDAQ. Foreign securities quoted only in the pink sheets would continue to be exempt under the information-supplying exemption in Rule 12g3-2(b). Virtually all comments received addressed this proposal.
Twenty-six commentators supported this proposal. These commentators stated that the proposal would result in more disclosure to investors, increase investor confidence, expand the Commission's ability to enforce the antifraud provisions, and would eliminate the unequal treatment of foreign issuers, who now can use the information-supplying exemption to get on NASDAQ, and U.S. issuers, who must register their securities for inclusion in NASDAQ. A Canadian broker stated that many investors prefer NASDAQ-quoted Canadian securities on the incorrect assumption that they were registered with the Commission. Another individual stated that the proposal failed to go far enough and that the Commission should require Canadian issuers to report on Form 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K instead of Forms 20-F and 6-K. Some commentators stated that some Canadian corporations misuse the exemption and also make illegal distributions of their securities in the U.S.
One hundred thirty-three commentators opposed this proposal. Twenty-two commentators disagreed with the analysis in the proposing release that obtaining inclusion in NASDAQ is voluntary entry into the U.S. capital market for various reasons. Eight stated that the acts necessary to obtain inclusion in NASDAQ are minimal and should not be used to justify the imposition of Exchange Act reporting. Others noted that in the past the ADR depositary banks were allowed to list certain foreign securities and continue to pay the fees. Twelve stated that most foreign issuers have their securities included in NASDAQ as a convenience to U.S. shareholders and the issuer does not receive as many benefits as U.S. issuers.
Eighteen commentators opposing the proposals stated that they were unaware of any problems with the current rules and thirty-one stated that the information-supplying exemption provided investors with adequate information.
All commentators opposing the proposal assumed that many foreign issuers would withdraw from NASDAQ and have their securities traded in the pink sheets instead of registering. The following unfavorable consequences were identified: increased price spreads, decrease in information, price quotes not carried in newspapers, less liquid market and fewer institutions in the market, absence of NASD surveillance, and delays in execution of transfers. These factors could cause a price drop of twenty percent according to one estimate.
Other objections to this proposal are: increased red tape, increased burden on foreign issuers, loss of investment opportunities and limits on freedom of choice, forced trading in foreign markets, forced use of disreputable dealers or foreign brokers, increased Commission budget, unfair change in policy, inconsistency with Congressional interest, possible retaliation by foreign governments, and reinforced fears of foreign issuers that the Commission repeatedly changes its rules.
Two commentators estimated the cost of registering securities under Section 12(g). One estimated it to be $150,000. A law firm, representing some Canadian issuers with registered securities, estimated the cost to be $12,000-$15,000. A Canadian issuer subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act stated it did not find reporting to be burdensome in terms of time or cost.
Since its commencement in 1971, NASDAQ has matured into a major securities market,4 providing securities quoted on NASDAQ with heightened visibility and access to active trading markets. As a result, NASDAQ has become an attractive alternative to exchange listing for foreign issuers which desire access to U.S. trading markets for the convenience of their U.S. shareholders or to raise capital, but which wish to avoid registration under Section 12. Although registration is required for exchange listing, foreign securities have been included in NASDAQ without Section 12 registration through use of the information-supplying exemption of Rule 12g3-2(b), which was adopted in 1967, prior to the start of NASDAQ, and was intended to exempt from registration foreign issuers whose securities were traded in the U.S. without the voluntary action of the issuer.
In the past, foreign securities could be included in NASDAQ without the-participation of the issuer; at present, however, the consent of the issuer is required before a foreign security can be quoted in NASDAQ.5 Accordingly, the Commission believes that foreign securities included in NASDAQ should be regarded prospectively as voluntarily seeking U.S. trading markets, and hence should be denied the information-supplying exemption. Also, the Commission believes that the increased administrative sanctions available to the Commission resulting from the revisions are necessary. Finally, the Commission believes it is appropriate to eliminate any undue differences in the disclosure requirements of and the treatment of U.S. and foreign issuers with securities quoted on NASDAQ.
Nevertheless, the Commission acknowledges the concerns of many of the commentators. The Commission believes that applying the revisions prospectively and grandfathering the securities, as described below, is a pragmatic balance of these competing policies.6
Many of the foreign issuers that appear to be complying with the information-supplying exemption initially established it prior to the formation of NASDAQ or in its early years. As discussed above, until recently, persons other than the issuer could obtain the NASDAQ listing for foreign securities. Imposing the revised rule against such issuers could force them to withdraw from NASDAQ, consequently depriving U.S. investors of the accustomed market for such securities and, in some cases, reducing the depth and liquidity for these securities.
Securities of the non-Canadian issuers in compliance with the information-supplying exemption as of October 5, 1983 and currently quoted in NASDAQ are grandfathered indefinitely.7 However, the exemption will be extended to the Canadian securities only until January 1988. The recent hot-issue market in securities from Canada has created problems and abuses of the rule. Some issuers appear to have used the exemption as a means to make unregistered, illegal distributions of their securities over NASDAQ.8 Several commentators urged the Commission to address directly the problems associated with some of the issuers from Canada rather than using an overly broad approach as proposed. The adopted revision is consistent with the Commission's position of treating Canadian issuers the same as U.S. issuers for many purposes.9 Canadian issuers generally must file the same reports as domestic issuers under the Exchange Act and, unlike other foreign issuers, are subject to the proxy regulations and the short-swing profit recovery provisions. Moreover, the requirements for Canadian issuers to ultimately register their securities under Section 12 do not appear to be particularly burdensome in light of the similarity of the accounting principles and disclosure standards of the U.S. and Canada. Canadian issuers, unlike other foreign issuers, can use Form S-18 and the limited offering exemption of Regulation A. The coming-to-rest concept in Release No. 33-4708 (July 9, 1964) [29 FR 9828] treats offerings of U.S. issuers in Canada the same as offerings in the U.S. due to the close nexus of the markets. The Commission believes the revised rule, as adopted, adequately addresses the problems without undue market interference. The two year time period was selected to provide Canadian issuers with sufficient time to adjust their procedures or to register their securities and for the market to take into account any changes in the way such securities trade.
The Commission considered the alternative of imposing seasoning or suitability tests as conditions for listing on NASDAQ in reliance on the information-supplying exemption. Commentators suggested tests such as a history of active trading in the foreign market minimum income, minimum assets, and minimum capitalization. The Commission declined to adopt any of those tests because of the difficulty in forming objectively the proper test, and the lack of any specific theoretical basis for a particular test
III. Other Revisions
The Commission received no adverse comments on the proposed revisions to the successor issuer rules and has adopted them without change.
Several commenters objected to the proposed repeal of paragraph (d) of Rule 12g3-2 that exempts from Section 12(g) registration the securities of a non-Canadian issuer with any class of securities registered under Section 12(b) or any issuer filing reports under Section 15(d). The major consequences of repealing paragraph (d) is to require some of the 83 foreign issuers now subject to a Section 15(d) reporting obligation to register under Section 12(g) and thereby making their securities subject to the Williams Act.10 The commentators to the proposal pointed out potential problems due to inconsistent tender offer regulation among various countries.
The Williams Act has applied to Canadian and, since 1979, to other foreign equity securities registered under Section 12(b). Approximately 52 Canadian and 65 non-Canadian issuers have securities registered under this section. The proposal would merely end the anomaly of exempting foreign issuers now subject to reporting obligations because of the exchange listing of debt securities or because they have had a registration statement become effective under the Securities Act. Few problems have arisen due to the inconsistent regulations of various countries, but the Commission is aware of the possibility of such problems. As in the past, with respect to foreign securities subject to the Williams Act, such situations will continue to be resolved on a case-by-case basis.
Another consequence of the repeal of paragraph (d) and the consequent registration of securities under Section 12(g) is that certain Canadian issuers would become subject to the proxy requirements of Sections 14(a) and 14(c) of the Exchange Act and the rules thereunder and the short-swing profits provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and the rules thereunder. One commentator stated that the proposal would make Securities Act registration of equity securities more burdensome, extend U.S. regulation to the internal corporate affairs of Canadian issuers, and conflict with the voluntarism principle explained in the proposing release.
More than 50 Canadian issuers are currently subject to such regulations and the repeal of paragraph (d) requires some of the 23 Canadian issuers subject to Section 15(d) to register their securities under Section 12(g). Few problems have arisen in the past under these rules. The Commission believes it is anomalous to exempt those Canadians that have made a registered public offering in the U.S., who would otherwise be subject to Section 12, but not those whose securities are listed on a U.S. exchange or are registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act.
Foreign issuers that generally are owned and managed by U.S. persons are considered to be essentially U.S. issuers and are ineligible for any of the exemptions or forms available to other issuers organized under foreign law. As amended. Rule 405 and Rule 3b-4 set forth two elements to determine whether an issuer is an essentially U.S. issuer.11 The first element is that fifty percent of the issuer's shares are held by U.S. residents. The second element is that one of three conditions is present: (1) The issuer's business be principally administered in the U.S.; (2) a majority of the issuer's directors or executive officers be U.S. persons; or (3) fifty percent of the assets of the. issuer be located in the U.S. These elements combined concepts in the former and proposed definitions. The Commission believes these amendments will prevent evasion but are unlikely to apply to many issuers not intended to be covered by the concept.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
A copy of the Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is available upon . request from the Office of International Corporate Finance, Room 3094 (3-6), Division of Corporation Finance, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, D.C., 20549, telephone (202) 272-3246.
List of Subjects in 17 CFR Parts 230 and 240
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Securities.
Text of Amendments
17 CFR Chapter II is amended as follows:
PART 230—GENERAL RULES AND REGULATIONS, SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
§ 230.405 Definitions of terms.
* * * * *
Foreign private isuer: The term "foreign private issuer" means any foreign issuer other than a foreign government except an issuer meeting the following conditions: (1) More than 50 percent of the outstanding voting securities of such issuer are held of record either directly or through voting trust certificates or depositary receipts by residents of the United States; and (2) any of the following: (i) The majority of the executive officers or directors are United States citizens or residents, (ii) more than 50 percent of the assets of the issuer are located in the United States, or (iii) the business of the issuer is administered principally in the United States. For the purpose of this paragraph, the term "resident," as applied to security holders, shall mean any person whose address appears on the records of the issuer, the voting trustee, or the depositary as being located in the United States.
PART 240—GENERAL RULES AND REGULATIONS, SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
§ 240.3b-4 Definition of "foreign government," "foreign Issuer," and "foreign private issuer."
* * * * *
§ 240.12g-1 Exemption from section 12(g).
An issuer shall be exempt from the requirement to register any class of equity securities pursuant to section 12(g)(1) if on the last day of its most recent fiscal year the issuer had total assets not exceeding-$3,000,000 and, with respect to a foreign private issuer, such securities were not quoted in an automated inter-dealer quotation system.
§ 240.12g-3 to read as follows:
§ 240.12g-3 Registration of securities of successor Issuers.
§ 240.12g3-2 Exemptions for American depository receipts end certain foreign securities.
§ 240.15d-5 Reporting by successor issuers.
* * * * *
Statutory Basis
These amendments are adopted pursuant to authority in Sections 6, 7, 8. 10, and 19(a) of the Securities Act of 1933; Sections 12, 13, 15(d), and 23(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
(Secs. 6, 7, 8, 10, 19(a), 48 Stat. 78, 79, 81, 85; secs. 205, 209, 48 Stat. 906, 908; sec. 301, 54 Stat. 857; sec. 8, 68 Stat. 685; sec. 1, 79 Stat. 1051; sec. 308(a)(2), 90 Stat. 57,; secs. 12, 13, 15(d), 23(a), 48 Stat. 892, 894, 895, 901; secs. 1, 3, 8, 49 Stat. 1375, 1377, 1379; sec. 203(a), 49 Stat. 704; sec. 202, 68 Stat. 686; secs. 3, 4, 6, 78 Stat. 565-574; 9ecs. 1,2, 82 Stat. 454; sec. 28(c), 84 Stat. 1435; secs. 1, 2, 84 Stat. 1497; sec. 105(b), 88 Stat. 1503; secs. 8, 9, 10, 18, 89 Stat. 117, 118, 119, 155; sec. 308(b), 90 Stat. 57; secs. 202, 203, 204, 91 Stat. 1494, 1498, 1500; 15 U.S.C. 77f, 77g, 77h, 77j, 77s(a), 78l, 78m, 78o(d), 78w(a))
By the Commission.
George A. Fftzsimmons,
Secretary.
October 6, 1983.
[FR Doc. 83-27934 Filed 10-13-83:8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
1 Paragraph (b) of that rule exempts certain foreign securities from registration under section 12(g) of the Exchange Act if the issuer furnishes the Commission with copies of disclosure documents made public under foreign law or regulations. Release No. 33-6433 (October 28, 1982) [47 FR 50292] discusses this rule in more detail.
2 As explained below, the the securities of issuers listed in accompanying Release No. 34-20265. and currently quoted in NASDAQ are generally grandfathered.
3 Copies of these comment letters a well as a comment highlight prepared by the staff are in File No. S7-951 and are available for public inspection and copying at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
4 The monthly average share volume on NASDAQ for the first six months of 1983 was approximately three-fourths that of the New York Stock Exchange and nearly seven times larger than the volume of the American Stock Exchange.
5 As explained in the proposing release, foreign securities may be included in NASDAQ directly or in ADR form. These amendments apply equally to both.
6 Grandfathering is unusual in the securities laws, but see Section 3(a)(1) of the Securities Act and Section 12(f) of the Exchange Act.
7 Unless, of course, the securities are delisted from NASDAQ or the issuer fails to maintain the information-supplying exemption.
8 The Commission wishes to remind issuers and broker-dealers of their responsibilities during distributions of unregistered securities. See Release Nos. 33-4445 (February 2, 1962) [27 FR 2312] and 33-5168 (July 17, 1971).
9 In 1980, the Commission solicited public comment on whether to eliminate the distinction between Canadian and other foreign private issuers. Few comments, even those from Canadian issuers, supported elimination. Release No. 33-6235 (September 2, 1980) [45 FR 63693].
10 Sections 13(d), 13(e), 14(d), 14(e) and 14(f) of the Exchange Act regulate certain acquisitions of securities and tender offers.
11 The conditions are in the except clause in the definition of a foreign private issuer. Rules 405 (17 CFR 230.405) and 3b-4 (17 CFR 240.3b-4).