I believe that restricting leveraged and inverse ETFs is unnecessary as existing prospectuses already list and explain risks associated with these investments. Although I have passed the series 65, I see no reason that this certification or any other certifying exam would be necessary or beneficial to invest in these ETFs.
William Dirkes Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08
I believe that restricting leveraged and inverse ETFs is unnecessary as existing prospectuses already list and explain risks associated with these investments. Although I have passed the series 65, I see no reason that this certification or any other certifying exam would be necessary or beneficial to invest in these ETFs.