Traders in leveraged and inverse products don't need the federal government's protection in the form of limiting our freedom to trade. This proposal is another rung in the ladder of a burgeoining "nanny state," and the government needs to recognize its proper role as protecting us from clear and present dangers, not hypothetical ones. Because these products may carry more risk, so what? With great risk comes great rewards. Back off--please!
Raleigh Truitt Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08
Traders in leveraged and inverse products don't need the federal government's protection in the form of limiting our freedom to trade. This proposal is another rung in the ladder of a burgeoining "nanny state," and the government needs to recognize its proper role as protecting us from clear and present dangers, not hypothetical ones. Because these products may carry more risk, so what? With great risk comes great rewards. Back off--please!