While optics are ever present around good consumer advocacy policy, creating regulatory burden is not a good way to go about this.
In the strong capitalistic financial environment that the US exists in, retail investors should have the ability to put their money in Leveraged-Inverse ETFs if they so choose as long as they are aware of the long-term risks of holding such financial products.
Ultimately, further financial education should be implemented to ensure this influx of non-traditional retail investors engaged in the financial markets as result of populist sentiments around the GameStop fiasco last year along with a larger focus on brokerages PFOF model of business.
Jonathan Dubin Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08
Comments:
While optics are ever present around good consumer advocacy policy, creating regulatory burden is not a good way to go about this.
In the strong capitalistic financial environment that the US exists in, retail investors should have the ability to put their money in Leveraged-Inverse ETFs if they so choose as long as they are aware of the long-term risks of holding such financial products.
Ultimately, further financial education should be implemented to ensure this influx of non-traditional retail investors engaged in the financial markets as result of populist sentiments around the GameStop fiasco last year along with a larger focus on brokerages PFOF model of business.